Jeffery v. Uhler
| Eric Jeffery |
| D. Uhler |
| 1:2022cv04289 |
| July 21, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Lois Bloom |
| Rachel P Kovner |
| Kiyo A Matsumoto |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 28, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 Letter re: Related Habeas Matter by D. Uhler (Yotam, Avshalom) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Avshalom Yotam on behalf of D. Uhler (aty to be noticed) (Yotam, Avshalom) |
| Case Reassigned to Judge Rachel P. Kovner. Judge Kiyo A. Matsumoto no longer assigned to the case. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE: Within sixty days of the date of this Order, respondent shall file with the Court and serve on petitioner a return that shows why a writ of habeas corpus should not be granted. Respondent's return shall conform to the Court's Individual Rules governing habeas petitions. Petitioner may file a reply, if any, thirty days thereafter. Ordered by Judge Rachel P. Kovner on 7/25/2022. (Daus, Benjamin)
|
| Filing 7 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Davis, Kimberly) |
| Filing 6 Case transferred in from District of New York Northern; Case Number 9:22-cv-00572. Original file certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received. |
|
Filing 5
DECISION AND ORDER: ORDERED, that this action is transferred to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York. ORDERED, that the Clerk is directed to electronically transfer this action to the Clerk of the Eastern District of New York. The Court hereby waives the fourteen (14) day waiting period provided for in Local Rule 3.7. Signed by Senior Judge Lawrence E. Kahn on July 21, 2022. {order served via regular mail on petitioner}(nas ) [Transferred from New York Northern on 7/21/2022.]
|
|
Filing 4
TEXT ORDER REOPENING CASE: This action was administratively closed due to petitioner's failure to comply with the filing fee requirements, and petitioner was directed to respond to the Order if s/he wished to pursue this action. Petitioner has now responded. The Clerk is directed to reopen this action and restore it to the Court's active docket. Authorized by Senior Judge Lawrence E. Kahn on June 13, 2022. {text order served via regular mail on petitioner}(nas) [Transferred from New York Northern on 7/21/2022.]
|
| Filing fee: $ 5.00, receipt number SYR060967 (nas, ) [Transferred from New York Northern on 7/21/2022.] |
| Filing 3 Letter from Jeffery enclosing filing fee. (nas, ) [Transferred from New York Northern on 7/21/2022.] |
|
Filing 2
ORDER Directing Administrative Closure with Opportunity to Comply with Filing Fee Requirement: ORDERED that because this action was not properly commenced, the Clerk is directed to administratively close this action. ORDERED that if petitioner wants to pursue this action, he must so notify the Court WITHIN THIRTY (30) DAYS of the filing date of this Order and either: (1) pay the court's filing fee of five dollars ($5.00); or (2) submit a completed and signed IFP Application that has been certified by an appropriate prison official at his facility. Signed by Senior Judge Lawrence E. Kahn on June 1, 2022. {order and blank ifp form served via regular mail on petitioner}(nas) [Transferred from New York Northern on 7/21/2022.]
|
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Eric Jeffery. (Attachments: #1 cover letter, #2 disbursement sheet, #3 envelope)(nas, ) [Transferred from New York Northern on 7/21/2022.] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Jeffery v. Uhler | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Eric Jeffery | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: D. Uhler | |
| Represented By: | KINGS COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEYS OFFICE - GENERIC |
| Represented By: | NEW YORK STATE ATTORNEY GENERALS OFFICE - GENERIC |
| Represented By: | Avshalom Yotam |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
