Selman v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation
| Aaron Selman |
| National Railroad Passenger Corporation doing business as Amtrak |
| 1:2022cv04317 |
| July 22, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Brian M Cogan |
| Federal Employer's Liability |
| 45 U.S.C. ยง 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 1, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Minute Entry and Order for Initial Status Conference held on 09/01/2022 before Judge Brian M. Cogan. Both parties appeared by telephone. Plaintiff shall provide defendant with HIPAA authorization/medical release forthwith. The Court set the following discovery schedule: the parties shall exchange their Rule 26(a)(1) disclosures by 09/08/2022; serve interrogatories and written discovery requests by 09/22/2022; respond to interrogatories and produce discovery by 10/22/2022; and complete depositions by 12/16/2022, the date fact discovery ends. (Weisberg, Peggy) |
| Filing 11 CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT Proposed (Hofmann, Paul) |
| Filing 10 STATUS REPORT Joint by Aaron Selman (Hofmann, Paul) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Joseph Anthony Capraro on behalf of National Railroad Passenger Corporation (aty to be noticed) (Capraro, Joseph) |
| Filing 8 Letter MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, by National Railroad Passenger Corporation. (Ree, Sophia) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Sophia Ree on behalf of National Railroad Passenger Corporation (aty to be noticed) (Ree, Sophia) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Aaron Selman. National Railroad Passenger Corporation served on 8/4/2022, answer due 8/25/2022. (Hofmann, Paul) |
ORDER granting #8 . The Court has no problem extending defendant's time to answer to 9/23/2022 because, "[i]n truth, the answer in a civil action is the most useless paper in the courthouse." Alexander By and Through Alexander v. Richardson-Merrell Inc., 541 F.Supp. 93, 94 (S.D.N.Y. 1982). The extension of time to answer is not going to stop this case from moving forward quickly. The Initial Status Conference on 9/1/2022 will proceed as scheduled, and the parties must meet the preparatory requirements for that conference. Ordered by Judge Brian M. Cogan on 8/11/2022. (Weisberg, Peggy)
|
|
Filing 5
SCHEDULING ORDER: A telephonic Initial Status Conference is set for 9/1/2022 at 10:00 am. Parties will use the toll-free number 888-684-8852 followed by access code 6427877#. When the conference begins parties will be prompted to input the security code 4317#. See attached mandatory requirements for the conference. In addition, plaintiff is directed to serve on defendant a complete set of medical releases and authorizations together with the summons and complaint. Ordered by Judge Brian M. Cogan on 7/22/2022. (Weisberg, Peggy)
|
| Filing 4 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
| Filing 3 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to National Railroad Passenger Corporation. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against National Railroad Passenger Corporation (Amtrak) filing fee $ 402, receipt number ANYEDC-15774629 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -NO,, filed by AARON SELMAN. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons) (Hofmann, Paul) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Brian M. Cogan. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Selman v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Aaron Selman | |
| Represented By: | Paul T. Hofmann |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: National Railroad Passenger Corporation doing business as Amtrak | |
| Represented By: | Joseph Anthony Capraro |
| Represented By: | Sophia Ree |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
