Arias v. APH Group LLC et al
Ubaldo Arias |
APH Group LLC, Carlos Patel and Ashok Patel |
1:2022cv04350 |
July 25, 2022 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
Hector Gonzalez |
Labor: Fair Standards |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 9, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
ORDER: The Court adopts the parties' proposed discovery plan #9 as the Court's scheduling order required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b). However, given the significant time afforded by these deadlines, Parties should be aware that any extensions are extremely unlikely. Ordered by Judge Hector Gonzalez on 9/9/2022. (Duffy, Matthew) |
Filing 9 CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT (Maguire, Jeffrey) |
Filing 8 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, by APH Group LLC, Ashok Patel, Carlos Patel. (Klein, Nolan) |
Filing 7 Letter MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, by APH Group LLC, Ashok Patel, Carlos Patel. (Klein, Nolan) |
ORDER granting Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer #7 . Defendants' time to respond to Plaintiff's Complaint #1 is extended to August 29, 2022. The deadline for submitting the joint letter describing the case and the case management plan #6 remains the same. Ordered by Judge Hector Gonzalez on 8/15/2022. (Duffy, Matthew) |
Filing 6 SCHEDULING ORDER: Counsel for all parties are directed to file on the docket a joint letter describing the case and a completed civil case management plan by SEPTEMBER 8, 2022 as further described in the attached mandatory requirements. Requests for adjournment of the deadline for these submissions will be considered only if made in writing and otherwise in accordance with Section I.D of the Court's Individual Practices. Ordered by Judge Hector Gonzalez on 8/3/2022. (Duffy, Matthew) |
Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Ubaldo Arias. APH Group LLC served on 7/25/2022, answer due 8/15/2022. (Maguire, Jeffrey) |
Filing 4 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
Filing 3 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
Filing 2 Summons Issued as to All Defendants. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against APH Group LLC, Ashok Patel, Carlos Patel filing fee $ 402, receipt number ANYEDC-15778954 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -NO,, filed by Ubaldo Arias. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons Proposed Summons, #3 Supplement Opt-in Form - (UA)) (Maguire, Jeffrey) |
Case Assigned to Judge Hector Gonzalez. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.