Weng v. Frazier
Petitioner: Xianglan Weng
Respondent: Denise M. Frazier
Case Number: 1:2022cv04526
Filed: August 2, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Presiding Judge: Hector Gonzalez
Nature of Suit: Other Immigration Actions
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 30, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 30, 2022 Opinion or Order ORDER DISMISSING CASE as per Stipulation of Dismissal filed at docket entry No. #7 . Ordered by Judge Hector Gonzalez on September 30, 2022. (Neptune, Pierre)
September 29, 2022 Filing 7 STIPULATION of Dismissal without prejudice by Denise M. Frazier (Schumacher, Robert)
August 16, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 SCHEDULING ORDER: The United States Attorney's Office, as attorney for Defendants, is directed to file an Answer or otherwise respond to the summons and complaint, according to the deadlines described in the accompanying Order. Ordered by Judge Hector Gonzalez on 8/16/2022. (Duffy, Matthew)
August 5, 2022 Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Robert W. Schumacher, II on behalf of Denise M. Frazier (aty to be noticed) (Schumacher, Robert)
August 2, 2022 Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Denise M. Frazier, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Davis, Kimberly)
August 2, 2022 Filing 3 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (Davis, Kimberly)
August 2, 2022 Filing 2 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Davis, Kimberly)
August 2, 2022 Filing 1 PETITION for Naturalization Hearing In The Nature Of Mandamus filing fee $ 402, receipt number ANYEDC-15804251, filed by Xianglan Weng. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons, #3 Exhibit) (Yerman, Gary)
August 2, 2022 Case Assigned to Judge Hector Gonzalez. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Davis, Kimberly)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Weng v. Frazier
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Xianglan Weng
Represented By: Gary J. Yerman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Denise M. Frazier
Represented By: Robert W. Schumacher, II
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?