Kumar v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Satish Kumar
Defendant: Uber Technologies, Inc. and Uber USA, LLC
Case Number: 1:2022cv04739
Filed: August 11, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Presiding Judge: Frederic Block
Referring Judge: Sanket J Bulsara
Nature of Suit: Motor Vehicle
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 5, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 5, 2022 Opinion or Order ORDER: In light of the notice of settlement #9 the initial conference scheduled for 10/7/2022 is adjourned sine die. The parties are directed to file a Stipulation of Dismissal by 10/26/2022. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Sanket J. Bulsara on 10/5/2022. (MD)
October 4, 2022 Filing 9 Letter Status letter case settled by Satish Kumar (Schenck, Susan)
August 29, 2022 Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Susan Schenck on behalf of Satish Kumar (aty to be noticed) (Schenck, Susan)
August 18, 2022 Filing 7 ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) by Uber Technologies, Inc., Uber USA, LLC. (Burke, James)
August 15, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 SCHEDULING ORDER: A telephonic initial conference will be held at 10:30 A.M. on 10/07/2022 before Magistrate Judge Sanket J. Bulsara. The parties are directed to call the toll-free number 877-336-1274. The access code is 6534420. The parties shall dial in five (5) minutes before the conference. Counsel are directed to complete the attached Rule 26(f) Report and electronically file same with the Court no later than 10/04/2022. Should the parties wish to adopt a plan for discovery different from the structure in the Rule 26(f) Report, they may do so only if they file a letter explaining why such a plan is appropriate in this case. Upon receipt of this email counsel shall confirm with each other of the date and time of this telephonic initial conference. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Sanket J. Bulsara on 8/15/2022. (Manson, Eddie)
August 12, 2022 Filing 5 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (Bowens, Priscilla)
August 12, 2022 Filing 4 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Bowens, Priscilla)
August 12, 2022 This case has been opened in the Eastern District of New York. If you plan to continue representing your client(s), you must be admitted to practice before this court. You must do so by applying for Pro Hac Vice or permanent admission. To apply for Pro Hac Vice admission, you must first register for an ECF login and password. Please visit the Court's website at www.nyed.uscourts.gov/attorney-admissions for guidance. Once registered, you must electronically file a Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice. You must pay the required pro hac vice fee online. (Bowens, Priscilla)
August 11, 2022 Case Assigned to Judge Frederic Block and Magistrate Judge Sanket J. Bulsara. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Bowens, Priscilla)
August 11, 2022 Filing 3 Civil Cover Sheet.. Re #1 Notice of Removal, #2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Uber Technologies, Inc., Uber USA, LLC (Burke, James)
August 11, 2022 Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Uber Technologies, Inc., Uber USA, LLC identifying Corporate Parent Uber Technologies Inc. for Uber USA, LLC. (Burke, James)
August 11, 2022 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Uber Technologies, Inc., Uber USA, LLC from Supreme Queens, case number 711857/2022. ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ANYEDC-15836363) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Summons & Complaint, #2 Exhibit Affidavits of Service, #3 Exhibit Plaintiff Verified Bill of Particulars, #4 Exhibit Action Papers) (Burke, James)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Kumar v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Satish Kumar
Represented By: Jack L. Grossman
Represented By: Susan Schenck
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Uber Technologies, Inc.
Represented By: James F. Burke
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Uber USA, LLC
Represented By: James F. Burke
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?