Baker v. Pestana Park Avenue
| Eric Tymell Baker |
| Pestana Park Avenue |
| 1:2022cv05060 |
| August 29, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Lois Bloom |
| Eric R Komitee |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 24, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
TRANSFER ORDER: Plaintiff Eric Tymell Miles-Baker also known as Eric Tymell Baker, a resident of New York County, proceeding pro se, filed these two actions against the United States Department of Agriculture and the Pestana Park Avenue Hotel. Accordingly, the Clerk of Court is directed to transfer these actions to the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. See 28 U.S.C. 112(b), 1406(a). The Court offers no opinion on the merits of these actions. The provision of Local Rule 83.1 requiring a seven-day stay is hereby waived. No summonses will issue from this Court, and the Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to mark these cases closed upon transfer. The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. SO ORDERED by Magistrate Judge Lois Bloom on 10/20/2022. C/mailed to pro se Plaintiff. Case transferred electronically to the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York via CM/ECF Extract Civil Case. ALL FILINGS ARE TO BE MADE IN THE TRANSFER COURT, DO NOT DOCKET TO THIS CASE. (WL)
|
| Filing 3 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Davis, Kimberly) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Eric Tymell Baker. (Davis, Kimberly) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Pestana Park Avenue, filed by Eric Tymell Baker. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Davis, Kimberly) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Baker v. Pestana Park Avenue | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Eric Tymell Baker | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Pestana Park Avenue | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
