Leyretana v. National Enterprise Systems, Inc.
Charmyn Leyretana |
National Enterprise Systems, Inc. |
1:2022cv05069 |
August 26, 2022 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
Sanket J Bulsara |
Eric N Vitaliano |
Consumer Credit |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act |
Defendant |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 28, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 ORDER granting #10 Motion to Remand to State Court. SO Ordered by Judge Eric N. Vitaliano on 9/28/2022. (Tavarez, Jennifer) |
Filing 10 Letter MOTION to Remand to State Court and So-Order Stipulation by National Enterprise Systems, Inc.. (Bruno, Jonathan) |
ORDER denying #4 Motion for Pre Motion Conference and denying as moot #9 Motion for Leave to File. Upon review of the parties' submissions at #4 and #8 , the Court concludes that a pre-motion conference is unnecessary. Defendant may proceed with its motion to remand. The parties are directed to file a joint proposed briefing schedule no later than 9/21/2022. Ordered by Judge Eric N. Vitaliano on 9/7/2022. (LoPresti, Joseph) |
Filing 9 Letter MOTION for Leave to File Document reply to Defendant's opposition by Charmyn Leyretana. (Barshay, David) |
Filing 8 RESPONSE in Opposition re #4 MOTION for pre motion conference TO REMAND TO STATE COURT filed by National Enterprise Systems, Inc.. (Bruno, Jonathan) |
Filing 7 ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) by National Enterprise Systems, Inc.. (Bruno, Jonathan) |
Filing 6 Corporate Disclosure Statement by National Enterprise Systems, Inc. (Bruno, Jonathan) |
Filing 5 SCHEDULING ORDER: A telephonic initial conference will be held at 12:30 P.M. on 10/07/2022 before Magistrate Judge Sanket J. Bulsara. The parties are directed to call the toll-free number 877-336-1274; access code is 6534420. The parties shall dial in five (5) minutes before the conference. Counsel are directed to complete the attached FDCPA Worksheet and electronically file same with the Court no later than 10/05/2022. Should the parties wish to adopt a plan for discovery different from the structure in the FDCPA Worksheet, they may do so only if they file a letter explaining why such a plan is appropriate in this case. Upon receipt of this email counsel shall confirm with each other of the date and time of this telephonic initial conference. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Sanket J. Bulsara on 9/1/2022. (Manson, Eddie) |
Filing 4 MOTION for pre motion conference TO REMAND TO STATE COURT by Charmyn Leyretana. (Barshay, David) |
Filing 3 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
Filing 2 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by National Enterprise Systems, Inc. from Civil Court of City of New York Queens County, case number 011350/2022. ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ANYEDC-15881650) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A- Summons and Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (Bruno, Jonathan) |
Case Assigned to Judge Eric N. Vitaliano and Magistrate Judge Sanket J. Bulsara. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
This case has been opened in the Eastern District of New York. If you plan to continue representing your client(s), you must be admitted to practice before this court. You must do so by applying for Pro Hac Vice or permanent admission. To apply for Pro Hac Vice admission, you must first register for an ECF login and password. Please visit the Court's website at www.nyed.uscourts.gov/attorney-admissions for guidance. Once registered, you must electronically file a Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice. You must pay the required pro hac vice fee online. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Leyretana v. National Enterprise Systems, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Charmyn Leyretana | |
Represented By: | David M. Barshay |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: National Enterprise Systems, Inc. | |
Represented By: | Jonathan B. Bruno |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.