Torres v. 65-11 Owners Corp.
| Lydia Torres |
| 65-11 Owners Corp. |
| 1:2022cv05133 |
| August 29, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Eric R Komitee |
| Taryn A Merkl |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 28, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
Order of Remand to State Court -- The Parties' stipulation is approved. The action is remanded to New York Supreme Court, County of Queens. Ordered by Judge Eric R. Komitee on 9/28/2022. (certified copy sent). (Guy, Alicia)
|
| Filing 9 STIPULATION to Remand Removed Action;Proposed Order by Lydia Torres (Goldstein, Mark) |
|
ORDER denying #6 Motion for Pre Motion Conference -- Pursuant to Rule III.B.2 of this Court's Individual Practices and Rules, parties are not required to request a pre-motion conference before moving to remand. Accordingly, Plaintiff is directed to serve her motion to remand by October 11, 2022. Defendant is directed to serve its opposition by November 10, 2022. Plaintiff shall file her reply, if any, by November 21, 2022. As a courtesy to the Court, the parties are encouraged not to file their motion papers and submit courtesy copies until the motion has been fully briefed, unless doing so might cause a party to miss a statutory deadline. See Rule III.C.2 this Court's Individual Rules and Practices. Ordered by Judge Eric R. Komitee on 9/27/2022. (Guy, Alicia)
|
| Filing 8 ANSWER to Complaint by 65-11 Owners Corp.. (Arcitio, Christopher) |
| Filing 7 Letter by 65-11 Owners Corp. (Arcitio, Christopher) |
| Filing 6 First MOTION for pre motion conference by Lydia Torres. (Goldstein, Mark) |
|
ORDER: In removal actions, Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 81(c)(2) requires the defendant to file an answer 21 days after service of the initial pleading or 7 days after the notice of removal was filed, whichever is longer. Defendant filed their notice of removal in this case on 8/29/2022, but have failed to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint, which was originally filed in state court on 3/24/2022. Defendants are hereby directed to file an answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint in this case on or before 9/22/2022. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Taryn A. Merkl on 9/16/2022. (Chan, Kaity)
|
| Filing 5 Corporate Disclosure Statement by 65-11 Owners Corp. (Arcitio, Christopher) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Christopher Arcitio on behalf of 65-11 Owners Corp. (notification declined or already on case) (Arcitio, Christopher) |
| Filing 3 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
| Filing 2 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by 65-11 OWNERS CORP. from Queens County Supreme Court, case number 706370/2022. ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ANYEDC-15888487) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit, #5 Civil Cover Sheet) (Arcitio, Christopher) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Eric R. Komitee and Magistrate Judge Taryn A. Merkl. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
| This case has been opened in the Eastern District of New York. If you plan to continue representing your client(s), you must be admitted to practice before this court. You must do so by applying for Pro Hac Vice or permanent admission. To apply for Pro Hac Vice admission, you must first register for an ECF login and password. Please visit the Court's website at www.nyed.uscourts.gov/attorney-admissions for guidance. Once registered, you must electronically file a Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice. You must pay the required pro hac vice fee online. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Torres v. 65-11 Owners Corp. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Lydia Torres | |
| Represented By: | Mark Ira Goldstein |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: 65-11 Owners Corp. | |
| Represented By: | Christopher Arcitio |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
