Todd v. United States et al
Plaintiff: Taijay Todd
Defendant: United States, Grisom and Megan Verry-Bailey
Respondent: Service List
Case Number: 1:2022cv05652
Filed: September 22, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Presiding Judge: Lois Bloom
Referring Judge: Ann M Donnelly
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions (Prison Condition)
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 26, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 4, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 14 SUMMONS ISSUED as to The United States; Officer Grisom; Megan Verry-Bailey, P.A.. (Courtesy copies of the Summons, the Court's 11/3/2022 Order and Plaintiff's #1 Complaint sent to the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Eastern District of New York; the Attorney General of the United States in Washington, D.C; and the Agency.) (WL)
November 3, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER: This pro se Federal Tort Claims Act and Bivens case regarding events at the Metropolitan Detention Center was filed in the Northern District of Illinois and was transferred to this Court. Plaintiff's #3 application to proceed in forma pauperis under 28 U.S.C. 1915 is granted. The United States Marshals Service is directed to serve the summons, complaint, and a copy of this Order upon the named defendants without prepayment of fees. The parties shall advise the Court by signing the enclosed form whether they jointly consent to trial and decision on this case by me, a United States Magistrate Judge, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c). SO ORDERED by Magistrate Judge Lois Bloom on 11/3/2022. C/mailed w/Attachments: #1 Individual Practices of Magistrate Judge Lois Bloom, #2 Consent to Trial and Decision by a United States Magistrate Judge. (WL)
October 25, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 12 Letter dated 10/25/22 from Pro se office, to Warden or Superintendent re: monthly deductions from plaintiff's prison trust fund account. (RG)
October 21, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 11 Prisoner Authorization submitted by T. Todd. (RG)
October 14, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 9 NOTICE of Consent to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction signed by pro se plaintiff only. (TL)
October 12, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 10 Letter dated 9/27/22 from Taijay Todd, Pro Se re legal mail. (TL)
October 6, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 NOTICE OF DEFICIENT FILING, litigant notified of deficiency(s) that must be corrected within fourteen (14) days. (RG)
September 22, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Bowens, Priscilla)
September 22, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 Case transferred in from District of Illinois Northern; Case Number 3:22-cv-50313. Original file certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received.
September 21, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 TRANSFERRED to the Eastern District of New York the electronic record. (jp, ) [Transferred from Illinois Northern on 9/22/2022.]
September 21, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER; The Clerk of Court is directed to transfer this case forthwith to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York for further consideration. Plaintiff asserts claims concerning the conduct of prison officials at the Metropolitan Detention Center, which is located in the Eastern District of New York. 28 U.S.C. 112(c). Signed by the Honorable Iain D. Johnston on 9/21/2022: Mailed notice (yxp, ) [Transferred from Illinois Northern on 9/22/2022.]
September 7, 2022 Opinion or Order MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis SEE ENTRY #3 by Taijay Todd. (Bowens, Priscilla)
September 7, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 APPLICATION by Plaintiff Taijay Todd for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (pg, ) [Transferred from Illinois Northern on 9/22/2022.]
September 7, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 PRISONER CIVIL Cover Sheet (pg, ) [Transferred from Illinois Northern on 9/22/2022.]
September 7, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 1 RECEIVED Complaint and 0 copies by Taijay Todd (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(pg, ) [Transferred from Illinois Northern on 9/22/2022.]
September 7, 2022 Opinion or Order MAILED copy of the Clerk's Notice entry along with the Joint Consent Form to Taijay Todd. (jp, ) [Transferred from Illinois Northern on 9/22/2022.]
September 7, 2022 Opinion or Order CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (pg, ) [Transferred from Illinois Northern on 9/22/2022.]
September 7, 2022 Opinion or Order CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Iain D. Johnston and Honorable Lisa A. Jensen. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Lisa A. Jensen. Case assignment: Random assignment. (pg, ) [Transferred from Illinois Northern on 9/22/2022.]

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Todd v. United States et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Taijay Todd
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: United States
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Grisom
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Megan Verry-Bailey
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Service List
Represented By: AUSA - Rockford
Represented By: Prisoner Correspondence 2 - Internal Use Only
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?