Shoham v. United Airlines, Inc.
| Yifat Shoham |
| United Airlines, Inc. |
| 1:2022cv05677 |
| September 22, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Dora Lizette Irizarry |
| Ramon E Reyes |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 21, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
ORDER terminating #5 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction; terminating #6 Motion to Change Venue; AND Order of Remand to State Court -- To New York State Supreme Court, Queens County, Case Index Number 717509/2022 --- For the reasons set forth in the ATTACHED WRITTEN SUMMARY ORDER OF REMAND, this case is remanded for lack of subject matter jurisdiction to New York State Supreme Court, Queens County, under Index No. 717509/2022, for further proceedings. SO ORDERED by Judge Dora Lizette Irizarry on 10/21/2022. (Irizarry, Dora)
|
| Filing 6 Joint MOTION to Change Venue by United Airlines, Inc.. (Grossman, Kirsten) |
|
ORDER -- -- On September 29, 2022, Defendant filed a motion to dismiss pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(2) and subsequently provided to the Court what purports to be a courtesy copy. The purported courtesy copy is just a stack of papers held together by a single binder clip. My Rules specifically require that all exhibits be tabbed and indexed properly. See, Judge Irizarry's Individual Rules and Practices in Civil Cases, Section IV(F)(1). It also should contain a cover letter and an index of exhibits. Everything should be bound or stapled together. Defendant is directed to provide to chambers a proper courtesy copy BY NO LATER THAN OCTOBER 13, 2022. Counsel are admonished that the Court will not tolerate sloppy and careless practices. SO ORDERED by Judge Dora Lizette Irizarry on 10/7/2022. (Irizarry, Dora)
|
| Filing 5 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction by United Airlines, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support, #2 Declaration, #3 Proposed Order, #4 Certificate of Service) (Grossman, Kirsten) |
| Filing 4 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
| Filing 3 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
| Filing 2 Civil Cover Sheet.. Re Notice: Re: Incomplete Civil Cover Sheet, by United Airlines, Inc. (Grossman, Kirsten) |
| Notice: Re: Re: Civil Cover Sheet. The Clerk's Office cannot assign this case without a completed Civil Cover Sheet. All questions *** INCLUDING the CERTIFICATION OF ARBITRATION ELIGIBILITY*** section on the second page needs to be answered. Please submit Civil Cover Sheet. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Dora Lizette Irizarry and Magistrate Judge Ramon E. Reyes, Jr. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
| This case has been opened in the Eastern District of New York. If you plan to continue representing your client(s), you must be admitted to practice before this court. You must do so by applying for Pro Hac Vice or permanent admission. To apply for Pro Hac Vice admission, you must first register for an ECF login and password. Please visit the Court's website at www.nyed.uscourts.gov/attorney-admissions for guidance. Once registered, you must electronically file a Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice. You must pay the required pro hac vice fee online. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by All Defendants from Supreme Court of New York Queens County, case number 717509/2022. ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ANYEDC-15968078) (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service) (Grossman, Kirsten) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Shoham v. United Airlines, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Yifat Shoham | |
| Represented By: | Kenneth F. McCallion |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: United Airlines, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Kirsten McCaw Grossman |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
