Barrett v. Hochui
| Andrew Barrett |
| Kathy Hochui |
| 1:2022cv05740 |
| September 21, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Lois Bloom |
| Hector Gonzalez |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 3, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Case transferred from New York Eastern has been opened in Northern District of New York - Main Office (Syracuse) [NextGen CM/ECF Release 1.7 (Revision 1.7.1)] as case 9:22-cv-01027, filed 10/03/2022. (TL) |
Filing 5
ORDER: The Clerk of Court is directed to immediately transfer this action to the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York. The decision on Plaintiffs application to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915 and enforcement of the Prison Litigation Reform Act is reserved for the transferee Court. The Court offers no opinion on the merits of this action. Rule 83.1 of the Local Rules for the Eastern District of New York, which requires a seven-day delay in the transfer of relevant case materials, is waived. The Clerk of Court is directed to mail a copy of this order to Plaintiff and note service on the docket. Ordered by Judge Hector Gonzalez on September 29, 2022.Case transferred to District of Northern District of New York. Original file, certified copy of transfer order, and docket sheet sent. ALL FILINGS ARE TO BE MADE IN THE TRANSFER COURT, DO NOT DOCKET TO THIS CASE. (Neptune, Pierre)
|
| Filing 4 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Davis, Kimberly) |
| Filing 3 Prisoner Authorization (Davis, Kimberly) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Andrew Barrett. (Davis, Kimberly) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Kathy Hochui, filed by Andrew Barrett. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Davis, Kimberly) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Barrett v. Hochui | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Andrew Barrett | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Kathy Hochui | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
