Gargano v. 14th State of Vermont
Plaintiff: John Andrew Gargano
Defendant: 14th State of Vermont
Case Number: 1:2022cv05789
Filed: September 28, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Presiding Judge: Pamela K Chen
Referring Judge: Peggy Kuo
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 17, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 17, 2022 Filing 7 CLERK'S JUDGMENT: ORDERED and ADJUDGED that Plaintiff's fee-paid Complaint is dismissed without prejudice as barred by the Eleventh Amendment and as frivolous; that the Commissioner's motion to dismiss is granted; that this action is dismissed; that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3), any appeal would not be taken in good faith; and that in forma pauperis status is denied for purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 44445 (1962). Signed by Brenna B. Mahoney, Clerk of Court by J. Poveda, Deputy Clerk on 10/17/2022. (C/M w-appeals packet as to pro se pltff. John Andrew Gargano) (ML) \
October 14, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER: For the reasons stated in the attached Memorandum and Order, the Court dismisses Plaintiff's case. The Clerk of Court is respectfully requested to enter judgment accordingly and terminate this action. Ordered by Judge Pamela K. Chen on 10/14/2022. (SK)
October 6, 2022 Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by John Andrew Gargano of 14th State of Vermont (Philip Scott, Governor of 14th State) served on 9/29/2022, answer due 10/20/2022. (ML)
September 29, 2022 Filing 4 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Bowens, Priscilla)
September 28, 2022 Filing 3 Summons Issued as to 14th State of Vermont. (Bowens, Priscilla)
September 28, 2022 Filing 2 FILING FEE: $ 402.00, receipt number 100001833 (Bowens, Priscilla)
September 28, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against 14th State of Vermont, filed by John Andrew Gargano. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Bowens, Priscilla) Modified on 9/29/2022 (Bowens, Priscilla).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Gargano v. 14th State of Vermont
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: John Andrew Gargano
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: 14th State of Vermont
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?