Aramark Food and Support Services Group, Inc. v. Cargill, Inc. et al
| Aramark Food and Support Services Group, Inc. |
| Cargill, Inc., Cargill Meat Solutions Corporation, JBS S.A., JBS USA Food Company Holdings, JBS Packerland, Inc., National Beef Packing Company, Tyson Foods, Inc. and Tyson Fresh Meats, Inc. |
| 1:2022cv05867 |
| September 30, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| LaShann DeArcy Hall |
| Robert M Levy |
| Anti-Trust |
| 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 15, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 CERTIFIED JPMDL Conditional Transfer Order (CTO-7), Pursuant to Rule 7.1 of the Rules of Procedure of the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, the action(s) on the attached schedule are transferred under 28 U.S.C. 1407 to the District of Minnesota for the reasons stated in the order of June 3, 2022, and, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable John R. Tunheim. (TL) |
| Filing 13 JPMDL Conditional Transfer Order (CTO-7), Pursuant to Rule 7.1 of the Rules of Procedure of the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, the action(s) on the attached schedule are transferred under 28 U.S.C. 1407 to the District of Minnesota for the reasons stated in the order of June 3, 2022, and, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable John R. Tunheim. This order does not become effective until it is filed in the Office of the Clerk of the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota. The transmittal of this order to said Clerk shall be stayed 7 days from the entry thereof. If any party files a notice of opposition with the Clerk of the Panel within this 7day period, the stay will be continued until further order of the Panel. (TL) |
| Case transferred from New York Eastern has been opened in U.S. District of Minnesota as case 0:22-cv-02905, filed 11/15/2022. (TL) |
| Case transferred to District of Minnesota. Original file, certified copy of transfer order, and docket sheet sent. ALL FILINGS ARE TO BE MADE IN THE TRANSFER COURT, DO NOT DOCKET TO THIS CASE. (TL) |
ORDER granting #12 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Robert M. Levy on 11/3/2022. (JM)
|
| Filing 12 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, by Aramark Food and Support Services Group, Inc.. (Iovieno, Philip) |
| Filing 11 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Aramark Food and Support Services Group, Inc.. Tyson Fresh Meats, Inc. served on 10/14/2022, answer due 11/4/2022. (Iovieno, Philip) |
| Filing 10 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Aramark Food and Support Services Group, Inc.. Tyson Foods, Inc. served on 10/14/2022, answer due 11/4/2022. (Iovieno, Philip) |
| Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Aramark Food and Support Services Group, Inc.. National Beef Packing Company served on 10/14/2022, answer due 11/4/2022. (Iovieno, Philip) |
| Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Aramark Food and Support Services Group, Inc.. JBS Packerland, Inc. served on 10/14/2022, answer due 11/4/2022. (Iovieno, Philip) |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Aramark Food and Support Services Group, Inc.. JBS USA Food Company Holdings served on 10/14/2022, answer due 11/4/2022. (Iovieno, Philip) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Aramark Food and Support Services Group, Inc.. Cargill Meat Solutions Corporation served on 10/11/2022, answer due 11/1/2022. (Iovieno, Philip) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Aramark Food and Support Services Group, Inc.. Cargill, Inc. served on 10/11/2022, answer due 11/1/2022. (Iovieno, Philip) |
| Filing 4 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (PB) |
| Filing 3 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (PB) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to All Defendants. (Attachments: #1 Rider) (PB) |
| Case Assigned to Judge LaShann DeArcy Hall and Magistrate Judge Robert M. Levy. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (PB) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Cargill Meat Solutions Corporation, Cargill, Inc., JBS Packerland, Inc., JBS S.A., JBS USA Food Company Holdings, National Beef Packing Company, Tyson Foods, Inc., Tyson Fresh Meats, Inc. filing fee $ 402, receipt number ANYEDC-15994757 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -YES,, filed by Aramark Food and Support Services Group, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons, #3 Rider to Summons) (Iovieno, Philip) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
