Jin v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services
| Mingxu Jin |
| United States Citizenship and Immigration Services |
| 1:2022cv06115 |
| October 12, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Hector Gonzalez |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 1, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
The United States Attorney, as attorney for Defendant, is directed to file an Answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's complaint #1 on or before January 4, 2023. If Defendant moves to dismiss the complaint, then Plaintiff's papers in opposition to that motion are due on or before February 6, 2023. Defendant may not file any reply papers in further support of any motion to dismiss without requesting leave of the Court.If Defendant moves to dismiss the complaint, then the parties may file their motion papers according to the schedule specified above without following the process of submitting pre-motion letters described in Section IV.A of the Court's Individual Practices. For any other motions or requests for relief, the parties must follow the Court's Individual Practices. Defendant's counsel is directed to serve on Plaintiff a copy of this Order. Ordered by Judge Hector Gonzalez on 12/1/2022. (MD)
|
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Nairi Simonian Gruzenski on behalf of United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (aty to be noticed) (Gruzenski, Nairi) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Mingxu Jin. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services served on 10/25/2022, answer due 12/24/2022. (JM) |
| Filing 5 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (PB) |
| Filing 4 Case transferred in from District of New York Southern; Case Number 1:22-cv-08113. Original file certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received. |
| MAILING RECEIPT: Document No: 3. Mailed to: Mingxu Jin 131-03 40RD Apt. 15G Flushing, NY 11354. (dsh) [Transferred from New York Southern on 10/12/2022.] |
| CASE TRANSFERRED OUT ELECTRONICALLY from the U.S.D.C. Southern District of New York to the United States District Court - District of Eastern District of New York.(rro) [Transferred from New York Southern on 10/12/2022.] |
|
Filing 3
TRANSFER ORDER: The Court directs the Clerk of Court to transfer this action to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C 1915(a)(3), that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). (Signed by Judge Katherine Polk Failla on 10/3/2022) (rro) Transmission to Office of the Clerk of Court for processing. [Transferred from New York Southern on 10/12/2022.]
|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against United States Citizenship and Immigration Services. (Filing Fee $402.00, Receipt Number 6251) Document filed by Mingxu Jin. (sac) [Transferred from New York Southern on 10/12/2022.] |
| Case Designated ECF. (sac) [Transferred from New York Southern on 10/12/2022.] |
| SUMMONS ISSUED as to United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. (sac) [Transferred from New York Southern on 10/12/2022.] |
| Magistrate Judge Gabriel W. Gorenstein is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (sac) [Transferred from New York Southern on 10/12/2022.] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Jin v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Mingxu Jin | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: United States Citizenship and Immigration Services | |
| Represented By: | Nairi Simonian Gruzenski |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
