Jean-Jacques v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: BERNARD JEAN-JACQUES
Defendant: Uber Technologies, Inc., UBER U.S.A., LLC and Uber USA, LLC
Case Number: 1:2022cv06138
Filed: October 12, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Presiding Judge: Frederic Block
Referring Judge: Roanne L Mann
Nature of Suit: Motor Vehicle
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 21, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 21, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 MEMORANDUM and ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: The Court adopts the Sua Sponte Report and Recommendation #5 without de novo review and directs the Clerk to remand this case back to Supreme Court, Kings County in accordance with the Sua Sponte Report and Recommendation. Ordered by Judge Frederic Block on 11/21/2022. (MI)
November 21, 2022 Opinion or Order Order of Remand to Supreme Court, Kings County, case number 522435/2021. The Clerk of Court is directed to remand this case back to State Court. Ordered by Judge Frederic Block on 11/21/2022. (MI)
October 21, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 SUA SPONTE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re #1 Notice of Removal, filed by Uber USA, LLC, Uber Technologies, Inc. The Court respectfully recommends that this action be remanded sua sponte to Supreme Court, Kings County, for lack of jurisdiction and for procedural defects. The removing defendants must promptly serve co-defendants with a copy of this opinion. Objections to R&R due by 11/4/2022. See attached. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Roanne L. Mann on 10/21/2022. (JP)
October 14, 2022 Filing 4 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (KD)
October 14, 2022 Filing 3 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (KD)
October 14, 2022 This case has been opened in the Eastern District of New York. If you plan to continue representing your client(s), you must be admitted to practice before this court. You must do so by applying for Pro Hac Vice or permanent admission. To apply for Pro Hac Vice admission, you must first register for an ECF login and password. Please visit the Court's website at www.nyed.uscourts.gov/attorney-admissions for guidance. Once registered, you must electronically file a Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice. You must pay the required pro hac vice fee online. (KD)
October 14, 2022 Case Assigned to Judge Frederic Block and Magistrate Judge Roanne L. Mann. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (KD)
October 12, 2022 Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by UBER U.S.A., LLC, Uber Technologies, Inc. (Carr, Timothy)
October 12, 2022 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by UBER U.S.A., LLC, Uber Technologies, Inc. from SUPREME COURT: KINGS COUNTY, case number 522435/2021. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Ex. A - SC, #2 Exhibit Ex. B - Email, #3 Exhibit Ex. C - Answers, #4 Exhibit Ex. D - Co-D Answer, #5 Exhibit Ex. E - Co-D Amended Answer, #6 Exhibit Ex. F - Process Affidavits, #7 Exhibit Ex. G - Copies of All Orders, #8 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #9 Certificate of Service Certificate of Service) (Carr, Timothy)
October 12, 2022 CIVIL CASE FILING FEE: $ 402, receipt number ANYEDC-16029368 (Carr, Timothy)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Jean-Jacques v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: BERNARD JEAN-JACQUES
Represented By: Mark J. Linder
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Uber Technologies, Inc.
Represented By: Timothy Carr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: UBER U.S.A., LLC
Represented By: Timothy Carr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Uber USA, LLC
Represented By: Timothy Carr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?