Gonzalo et al v. Rico Pollo #2 Restaurant, Corp. et al
| Abreu Gonzalo and Divaris Miguelina Mendez |
| Rico Pollo #2 Restaurant, Corp. and Juan F Puntiel |
| 1:2022cv06258 |
| October 17, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Brian M Cogan |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 8, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 17
AFFIDAVIT/DECLARATION in Support re #14 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim and Compel Arbitration Pursuant to 9 U.S.C. 3 of Danielle E. Mietus, Esq. filed by Juan F Puntiel, Rico Pollo #2 Restaurant, Corp.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1) (Mietus, Danielle)
|
|
Filing 16
AFFIDAVIT/DECLARATION in Support re #14 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim and Compel Arbitration Pursuant to 9 U.S.C. 3 of Juan Puntiel filed by Juan F Puntiel, Rico Pollo #2 Restaurant, Corp.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B) (Mietus, Danielle)
|
|
Filing 15
MEMORANDUM in Support re #14 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim and Compel Arbitration Pursuant to 9 U.S.C. 3 filed by Juan F Puntiel, Rico Pollo #2 Restaurant, Corp.. (Mietus, Danielle)
|
|
Filing 14
MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim and Compel Arbitration Pursuant to 9 U.S.C. 3 by Juan F Puntiel, Rico Pollo #2 Restaurant, Corp.. (Mietus, Danielle)
|
|
Filing 13
NOTICE of Appearance by Danielle Elizabeth Mietus on behalf of Juan F Puntiel, Rico Pollo #2 Restaurant, Corp. (aty to be noticed) (Mietus, Danielle)
|
|
Filing 12
Summons Returned Unexecuted by Abreu Gonzalo as to Juan F Puntiel. (Schlade, Daniel)
|
|
Filing 11
SUMMONS Returned Executed by Abreu Gonzalo. Rico Pollo #2 Restaurant, Corp. served on 10/21/2022, answer due 11/11/2022. (Schlade, Daniel)
|
|
Filing 10
Proposed Scheduling Order by Abreu Gonzalo, Divaris Miguelina Mendez (Schlade, Daniel)
|
|
Filing 9
Letter Joint By All Parties by Abreu Gonzalo, Divaris Miguelina Mendez (Schlade, Daniel)
|
|
ORDER re #9 Joint Letter. Defendants shall file their motion to compel arbitration by 12/9/22. (The premotion conference is waived.) The Initial Status Conference is adjourned pending the Courts ruling on the motion. Ordered by Judge Brian M. Cogan on 11/25/2022. (Cogan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 8
First MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or otherwise respond to Complaint by Juan F Puntiel, Rico Pollo #2 Restaurant, Corp.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Stipulation) (Patel, Jasmine)
|
|
ORDER granting in part #8 . Defendants' time to answer extended until 12/9/2022. However, this Court does not wait for an answer to start the discovery process, therefore the Initial Status Conference will go forward as scheduled for 11/30/2022 and the parties are expected to be fully prepared to participate. Parties will use the toll-free number 888-684-8852 followed by access code 6427877#. When the conference begins parties will be prompted to input the security code 6258#. Parties are reminded to comply with the mandatory requirements for the conference at #7 . Ordered by Judge Brian M. Cogan on 11/9/2022. (PW)
|
|
Filing 7
SCHEDULING ORDER: A telephonic Initial Status Conference is set for 11/30/2022 at 1:00 pm. Parties will use the toll-free number 888-684-8852 followed by access code 6427877#. When the conference begins parties will be prompted to input the security code 6258#. See attached mandatory requirements for the conference. Ordered by Judge Brian M. Cogan on 10/18/2022. (PW)
|
|
Filing 6
Summons Issued as to Juan F Puntiel, Rico Pollo #2 Restaurant, Corp.. (KD)
|
|
Filing 5
This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (KD)
|
|
Filing 4
In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (KD)
|
|
Case Assigned to Judge Brian M. Cogan. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (KD)
|
|
Filing 3
Proposed Summons. by Abreu Gonzalo, Divaris Miguelina Mendez (Attachments: #1 Proposed Summons Proposed Summons) (Schlade, Daniel)
|
|
Filing 2
NOTICE of Appearance by Daniel Schlade on behalf of Abreu Gonzalo, Divaris Miguelina Mendez (notification declined or already on case) (Schlade, Daniel)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT 1:22-cv-06258 Gonzalo et al v. Rico Pollo #2 Restaurant, Corp. et al against Juan F Puntiel, Rico Pollo #2 Restaurant, Corp. filing fee $ 402, receipt number ANYEDC-16045330 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -NO,, filed by Abreu Gonzalo, Divaris Miguelina Mendez. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit Exhibit B) (Schlade, Daniel)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
