Lin v. Houghton et al
Qing Lin |
NY District Director Timothy Houghton, US Attorney General Merrick Garland, Secretary of DHS Alejandro Mayorkas and Texas Service Center |
1:2022cv06419 |
October 22, 2022 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
Hector Gonzalez |
Other Immigration Actions |
05 U.S.C. ยง 702 Administrative Procedure Act |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 5, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Jason Jia on behalf of Qing Lin (aty to be noticed) (Jia, Jason) |
Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Qing Lin. Merrick Garland served on 11/2/2022, answer due 1/2/2023; Timothy Houghton served on 11/2/2022, answer due 1/2/2023; Alejandro Mayorkas served on 11/2/2022, answer due 1/2/2023; Texas Service Center served on 11/2/2022, answer due 1/2/2023. (Jia, Jason) |
SCHEDULING ORDER: Defendants are directed to file an answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's complaint on or before January 3, 2023. If Defendants move to dismiss the complaint, then Plaintiff's papers in opposition to that motion are due on or before February 2, 2023. Defendants may not file any reply papers in further support of any motion to dismiss without requesting leave of the Court. If Defendants move to dismiss the complaint, then the parties may file their motion papers according to the schedule specified in this Order without following the process of submitting pre-motion letters described in Section IV.A of the Court's Individual Practices. For any other motions or requests for relief, the parties must follow the Court's Individual Practices. Ordered by Judge Hector Gonzalez on 11/3/2022. (BH) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Nairi Simonian Gruzenski on behalf of All Defendants (aty to be noticed) (Gruzenski, Nairi) |
Filing 4 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (PB) |
Filing 3 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (PB) |
Filing 2 Summons Issued as to All Defendants, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (PB) |
Case Assigned to Judge Hector Gonzalez. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (PB) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS against Merrick Garland, Timothy Houghton, Alejandro Mayorkas, Texas Service Center filing fee $ 402, receipt number ANYEDC-16064592 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -Yes,, filed by Qing Lin. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons Proposed Summons, #3 Exhibit Exhibits) (Richards, Marilia) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.