Brown v. Clair-Ben Corp.
| Christopher E. Brown |
| Clair-Ben Corp. and Khattab & Son, Inc. |
| 1:2022cv06709 |
| November 3, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Pamela K Chen |
| James R Cho |
| Nina R Morrison |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 22, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Khattab & Son, Inc., filed by Christopher E. Brown. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Summons) (Mussman, Louis) |
| Filing 8 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, by Christopher E. Brown. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Mussman, Louis) |
ORDER granting #8 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Defendant Clair-Ben Corp. shall answer, move or otherwise respond to the complaint by 1/20/2023. Ordered by Magistrate Judge James R. Cho on 12/16/2022. (SG)
|
| Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Christopher E. Brown. Clair-Ben Corp. served on 11/30/2022, answer due 12/21/2022. (Mussman, Louis) |
| Case Reassigned to Judge Nina Morrison. Judge Pamela K. Chen no longer assigned to the case. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (BBM) |
| Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Clair-Ben Corp.. (ML) (Main Document 6 replaced on 11/8/2022) (ML). |
| Filing 5 Proposed Summons. Re Quality Control Check - Summons by Christopher E. Brown (Mussman, Louis) |
| Filing 4 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (KD) |
| Filing 3 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (KD) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Pamela K. Chen and Magistrate Judge James R. Cho. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (KD) |
| Your proposed summons was not issued for one of the following reasons: The CLERK OF COURT NAME needs to be updated/corrected. Please correct and resubmit using Proposed Summons/Civil Cover Sheet. (KD) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Olivia Damaris Rosario on behalf of Christopher E. Brown (aty to be noticed) (Rosario, Olivia) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Clair-Ben Corp. filing fee $ 402, receipt number ANYEDC-16106905 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -Yes,, filed by Christopher E. Brown. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons) (Mussman, Louis) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
