Jimenez v. Riz Bagels Inc. et al
| Armando Hernandez Jimenez |
| Riz Bagels Inc. d/b/a Bagels Plus, Mohammed Rahman, Ibrahim Khan and Riz Bagels Inc. doing business as Bagels Plus |
| 1:2022cv06818 |
| November 8, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Ann M Donnelly |
| Ramon E Reyes |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 23, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
ORDER granting #12 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer re #12 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer All Defendants. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Ramon E. Reyes, Jr on 12/23/2022. (Reyes, Ramon)
|
| Filing 12 First MOTION for Extension of Time to File Document by Ibrahim Khan, Mohammed Rahman, Riz Bagels Inc.. (Segal, Mitchell) Modified on 12/23/2022 (Reyes, Ramon). |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by Mitchell Segal on behalf of Ibrahim Khan, Mohammed Rahman, Riz Bagels Inc. (aty to be noticed) (Segal, Mitchell) |
| Filing 10 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Armando Hernandez Jimenez. All Defendants. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit MS. JULIE (DOE) (REFUSED FULL NAME), CO-WORKER,, #2 Affidavit MS. JULIE (DOE) (REFUSED FULL NAME), CO-WORKER,) (Avshalumov, Roman) |
| Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Armando Hernandez Jimenez. Riz Bagels Inc. served on 11/21/2022, answer due 12/12/2022. (Avshalumov, Roman) |
| Filing 8 Summons Issued as to Ibrahim Khan, Mohammed Rahman, Riz Bagels Inc.. (KD) |
| Filing 7 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (KD) |
| Filing 6 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (KD) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Ann M Donnelly and Magistrate Judge Ramon E. Reyes, Jr. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (KD) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Avraham Y. Scher on behalf of Armando Hernandez Jimenez (aty to be noticed) (Scher, Avraham) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by James Patrick Peter O'Donnell on behalf of Armando Hernandez Jimenez (aty to be noticed) (O'Donnell, James) |
| Filing 3 Proposed Summons. Re #2 Proposed Summons/Civil Cover Sheet, #1 Complaint, by Armando Hernandez Jimenez (Avshalumov, Roman) |
| Filing 2 Civil Cover Sheet.. Re #1 Complaint, by Armando Hernandez Jimenez (Avshalumov, Roman) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Ibrahim Khan, Mohammed Rahman, Riz Bagels Inc. filing fee $ 402, receipt number ANYEDC-16119981 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -NO,, filed by Armando Hernandez Jimenez. (Avshalumov, Roman) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
