Joseph et al v. United States of America et al
| JOANNA A JOSEPH and SANTFORD RUCKER |
| United States of America, United States Postal Service, Breon Peace and Ernest Hollman |
| 1:2022cv07007 |
| November 16, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Hector Gonzalez |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1391 Personal Injury |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 31, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Shana C. Priore on behalf of United States Postal Service, United States of America (aty to be noticed) (Priore, Shana) |
ORDER: In response to Plaintiff's letter requesting an extension of time, see ECF No. #9 , the Court orders the parties to file the joint letter and proposed case management plan required by the Court's prior scheduling order, see ECF No. #4 , on or before February 22, 2023. Ordered by Judge Hector Gonzalez on 1/13/2023. (BH)
|
| Filing 9 Letter requesting extension of time to file case management plan by Joanna A Joseph, Santford Rucker (Tand, Jonathan) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Jonathan A Tand on behalf of All Plaintiffs (aty to be noticed) (Tand, Jonathan) |
| Filing 7 Summons Issued as to All Defendants, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (JM) |
| Filing 6 Proposed Summons. Re #1 Complaint by Joanna A Joseph, Santford Rucker (Ayoub, Chad) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Chad P. Ayoub on behalf of All Plaintiffs (aty to be noticed) (Ayoub, Chad) |
|
Filing 4
SCHEDULING ORDER: Counsel for all parties are directed to file on the docket a joint letter describing the case and a completed civil case management plan by January 13, 2023, as further described in the attached mandatory requirements. Requests for adjournment of the deadline for these submissions will be considered only if made in writing and otherwise in accordance with Section I.D of the Court's Individual Practices. Ordered by Judge Hector Gonzalez on 11/29/2022. (BH)
|
| Filing 3 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (KD) |
| Filing 2 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (KD) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Hector Gonzalez. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (KD) |
| FILING FEE: $ 402.00, receipt number ANYEDC-16145757 (KD) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against SANTFORD RUCKER Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -YES,, filed by JOANNA A JOSEPH. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Ripka, Alan) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
