Green v. Spisak
| Mr. David Green |
| Mr. Jason Spisak |
| 1:2022cv07087 |
| November 21, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Frederic Block |
| Marcia M Henry |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 21, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Appearance by Vivian R Harris on behalf of David Green (aty to be noticed) (Harris, Vivian) |
ORDER GRANTING #11 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Attorney Vivian R Harris is granted permission to appear pro hac vice on behalf of Plaintiff David Green. The attorney shall register for ECF at #www.pacer.gov. Once registered, the attorney shall file a notice of appearance and ensure that s/he receives electronic notification of activity in this case. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Marcia M. Henry on 12/06/2022. (RC)
|
| Filing 11 First MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice Filing fee $ 150, receipt number ANYEDC-16177744. by David Green. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing, #2 Exhibit Affidavit of Movant) (Harris, Vivian) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Laura M Staunton on behalf of Jason Spisak (aty to be noticed) (Staunton, Laura) |
|
ORDER re #9 : The Notice of Appearance at ECF #9 is signed by attorney Laura Staunton, but the ECF filer on the docket is attorney Marguerite Peck. Counsel are reminded that each attorney should have their own ECF credentials and that no attorney should file documents on ECF using another attorney's credentials. Accordingly, attorney Staunton is directed to re-file the notice of appearance using her own ECF credentials by 11/30/2022. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Marcia M. Henry on 11/28/2022. (MY)
|
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Marguerite D. Peck on behalf of Jason Spisak (notification declined or already on case) (Peck, Marguerite) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Marguerite D. Peck on behalf of Jason Spisak (notification declined or already on case) (Peck, Marguerite) |
| Filing 7 Civil Cover Sheet.. Re #1 Notice of Removal, by Jason Spisak (Peck, Marguerite) |
| Filing 6 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (SR) |
| Filing 5 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (SR) |
| This case has been opened in the Eastern District of New York. If you plan to continue representing your client(s), you must be admitted to practice before this court. You must do so by applying for Pro Hac Vice or permanent admission. To apply for Pro Hac Vice admission, you must first register for an ECF login and password. Please visit the Court's website at www.nyed.uscourts.gov/attorney-admissions for guidance. Once registered, you must electronically file a Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice. You must pay the required pro hac vice fee online. (SR) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Frederic Block and Magistrate Judge Marcia M. Henry. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (SR) |
| Filing 4 AFFIDAVIT of Service for Notice of Removal served on Plaintiff's Office on November 21, 2022, filed by Jason Spisak. (Peck, Marguerite) |
| Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Jason Spisak (Peck, Marguerite) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Jason Spisak from Supreme, Queens, case number 710509/2022. ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ANYEDC-16159181) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Summons and Complaint, #2 Exhibit Verified Answer, #3 Exhibit Plaintiff's CPLR 3017 response) (Peck, Marguerite) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Green v. Spisak | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Mr. David Green | |
| Represented By: | Vivian R Harris |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Mr. Jason Spisak | |
| Represented By: | Marguerite D. Peck |
| Represented By: | Laura M Staunton |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
