Stazzone v. Carmel Richmond Healthcare And Rehabilitation Center et al
Plaintiff: Joseph Stazzone
Defendant: Carmel Richmond Healthcare And Rehabilitation Center, ABC Corporation and ABC Partnership
Case Number: 1:2022cv07309
Filed: December 2, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Presiding Judge: Allyne R Ross
Referring Judge: Vera M Scanlon
2 Judge: Eric N Vitaliano
Nature of Suit: Personal Inj. Med. Malpractice
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Jury Demanded By: Defendant
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 14, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 14, 2022 Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by Jennifer Marie Lobaito on behalf of Carmel Richmond Healthcare And Rehabilitation Center (aty to be noticed) (Lobaito, Jennifer)
December 14, 2022 Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Dylan C. Braverman on behalf of Carmel Richmond Healthcare And Rehabilitation Center (notification declined or already on case) (Braverman, Dylan)
December 14, 2022 Filing 9 NOTICE by Carmel Richmond Healthcare And Rehabilitation Center re #8 Notice of Appearance as lead attorney and to be noticed (Braverman, Dylan)
December 14, 2022 Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Dylan C. Braverman on behalf of Carmel Richmond Healthcare And Rehabilitation Center (notification declined or already on case) (Braverman, Dylan)
December 9, 2022 Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Joseph Ciaccio on behalf of Joseph Stazzone (notification declined or already on case) (Ciaccio, Joseph)
December 9, 2022 Opinion or Order ORDER granting consent #6 Motion to Stay Discovery. In light of the jurisdictional issues to be considered in this case, and the parties' submission at #6 , discovery is stayed. There is no initial conference scheduled. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Vera M. Scanlon on 12/9/2022. (JR)
December 8, 2022 Filing 6 Consent MOTION to Adjourn Conference and Parties' Discovery Obligations (on consent) by Carmel Richmond Healthcare And Rehabilitation Center. (Lawless, Megan)
December 6, 2022 Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Megan A. Lawless on behalf of Carmel Richmond Healthcare And Rehabilitation Center (notification declined or already on case) (Lawless, Megan)
December 6, 2022 Opinion or Order ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to Judge Allyne R. Ross for all further proceedings. Judge Eric N. Vitaliano no longer assigned to case Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such.Ordered by Chief Judge Margo K. Brodie on 12/6/2022. (KD)
December 5, 2022 Filing 4 First MOTION for pre motion conference and to Hold Motion Practice in Abeyance by Carmel Richmond Healthcare And Rehabilitation Center. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Stay Orders) (Lawless, Megan)
December 5, 2022 Opinion or Order ORDER. In light of the extensive filings as to jurisdiction and immunity at #1 , within 21 days of the date of this Order, counsel are to submit a joint letter as to their respective positions as to whether discovery should proceed at this time or be stayed. Upon review, the Court will determine if a conference is necessary. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Vera M. Scanlon on 12/5/2022. (JR)
December 2, 2022 Filing 3 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (SR)
December 2, 2022 Filing 2 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (SR)
December 2, 2022 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Carmel Richmond Healthcare And Rehabilitation Center from Supreme Court, case number 152011/2022. ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ANYEDC-16189544) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Summons and Complaint, #2 Exhibit Accepted service, #3 Exhibit Martinez - Rivera - Brief for Defendants-Appellants, #4 Exhibit Leroy - Brief obo Brookdale Hospital Defendants, #5 Exhibit Leroy - Brief obo Mt. Sinai Hospital Defendants, #6 Exhibit Leroy - 2nd Circuit - Plaintiff's Brief in Leroy v. Hume, #7 Exhibit Martinez Brief obo Pltf-Appellee, #8 Exhibit Leroy - Reply Brief obo Defendants, #9 Exhibit Leroy Reply Brief obo Co-Def., #10 Exhibit Rivera-Zayas - Reply Brief., #11 Exhibit Amicus Briefs pending before the Second Circuit., #12 Exhibit Chamber of Commerce AMA Amicus Brief, #13 Exhibit Motion to File Amicus Curiae Brief & Proposed Amicus Brief, #14 Exhibit US Statement of Interest (M.D. Tenn) Centeno, #15 Civil Cover Sheet) (Braverman, Dylan)
December 2, 2022 Case Assigned to Judge Eric N. Vitaliano and Magistrate Judge Vera M. Scanlon. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (SR)
December 2, 2022 This case has been opened in the Eastern District of New York. If you plan to continue representing your client(s), you must be admitted to practice before this court. You must do so by applying for Pro Hac Vice or permanent admission. To apply for Pro Hac Vice admission, you must first register for an ECF login and password. Please visit the Court's website at www.nyed.uscourts.gov/attorney-admissions for guidance. Once registered, you must electronically file a Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice. You must pay the required pro hac vice fee online. (SR)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Stazzone v. Carmel Richmond Healthcare And Rehabilitation Center et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Joseph Stazzone
Represented By: Joseph Ciaccio
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Carmel Richmond Healthcare And Rehabilitation Center
Represented By: Dylan C. Braverman
Represented By: Megan A. Lawless
Represented By: Jennifer Marie Lobaito
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ABC Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ABC Partnership
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?