Barakat Halal Market, Inc. v. United States Department of Agriculture
| Barakat Halal Market, Inc. |
| United States Department of Agriculture |
| 1:2022cv07377 |
| December 6, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Hector Gonzalez |
| Other Statutes: Administrative Procedures Act/Review or Appeal of Agency Decision |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1446 Notice of Removal |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 11, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 STIPULATION of Dismissal with Prejudice by United States Department of Agriculture (Dharia, Ekta) |
ORDER DISMISSING CASE pursuant to the parties' stipulation of voluntary dismissal. See ECF No. #8 . Ordered by Judge Hector Gonzalez on 1/11/2023. (BH)
|
|
Filing 7
SCHEDULING ORDER: Counsel for all parties are directed to file on the docket a joint letter describing the case and a completed civil case management plan by January 27, 2023, as further described in the attached mandatory requirements. Requests for adjournment of the deadline for these submissions will be considered only if made in writing and otherwise in accordance with Section I.D of the Court's Individual Practices. Ordered by Judge Hector Gonzalez on 12/8/2022. (BH)
|
| Filing 6 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (KD) |
| Filing 5 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (KD) |
|
ORDER: The Court grants Defendant's motion for an extension of time to respond to Plaintiff's complaint. See ECF No. #3 . Defendant shall file an answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's complaint on or before January 27, 2023. Even if Defendant seeks a further extension of its time to respond to the complaint, the parties shall file the joint letter and case management plan required by the Court's scheduling order, see ECF No. #7 , on or before January 27, 2023, because the Court does not need Defendant's answer to set a discovery schedule. Ordered by Judge Hector Gonzalez on 12/8/2022. (BH)
|
| This case has been opened in the Eastern District of New York. If you plan to continue representing your client(s), you must be admitted to practice before this court. You must do so by applying for Pro Hac Vice or permanent admission. To apply for Pro Hac Vice admission, you must first register for an ECF login and password. Please visit the Court's website at www.nyed.uscourts.gov/attorney-admissions for guidance. Once registered, you must electronically file a Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice. You must pay the required pro hac vice fee online. (KD) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Hector Gonzalez. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (KD) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Daniel S. Perlman on behalf of Barakat Halal Market, Inc. (notification declined or already on case) (Perlman, Daniel) |
| Filing 3 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer , Move, or Otherwise Respond to the Complaint by United States Department of Agriculture. (Dharia, Ekta) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Ekta R. Dharia on behalf of United States Department of Agriculture (notification declined or already on case) (Dharia, Ekta) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by United States Department of Agriculture from Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of Queens, case number Index No. 724323/22. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Summons and Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Notice of Filing of Notice of Removal to State Court) (Dharia, Ekta) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Barakat Halal Market, Inc. v. United States Department of Agriculture | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Barakat Halal Market, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Daniel S. Perlman |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: United States Department of Agriculture | |
| Represented By: | Ekta R. Dharia |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
