Chen v. Jaddou et al
| ping chen |
| Ur Jaddou, Andrea Quarantillo and Alejandro Mayorkas |
| 1:2022cv07879 |
| December 27, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Nina R Morrison |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 702 Administrative Procedure Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 17, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 STIPULATION of Dismissal Without Prejudice by Ur Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas, Andrea Quarantillo (Gates, Elizabeth) |
ORDER DISMISSING CASE pursuant to the parties' #7 stipulation of dismissal. Ordered by Judge Nina R. Morrison on 2/17/2023. (BC)
|
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Ping Chen. Ur Jaddou served on 1/10/2023, answer due 3/13/2023; Alejandro Mayorkas served on 1/10/2023, answer due 3/13/2023; Andrea Quarantillo served on 1/10/2023, answer due 3/13/2023. (Wu, King Lun) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Elizabeth Gates on behalf of All Defendants (aty to be noticed) (Gates, Elizabeth) |
|
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE and Electronic Service upon the US Attorneys Office. (1) The United States Attorney, as attorney for Respondents, shall show cause before this Court why a writ of mandamus should not be issued by filing a return to the petition; (2) Within sixty (60) days of this Order, the United States Attorney shall serve a copy of their return on the Petitioner herein and shall file the original thereof, with proof of service, with the Clerk of the Court; and (3) Petitioner shall file a reply, if any, with the Clerk of the Court within thirty (30) days of receiving the return and serve a copy on the Respondents. Ordered by Judge Nina R. Morrison on 12/29/2022. (BC)
|
| Filing 4 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (SR) |
| Filing 3 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (SR) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to All Defendants, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Attachments: #1 Alejandro Mayorkas, #2 Andrea Quarantillo) (SR) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Nina R. Morrison. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (SR) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR MANDAMUS AND DECLARATORY JUDGEMENT against Ur Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas, Andrea Quarantillo filing fee $ 402, receipt number ANYEDC-16260622 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -NO,, filed by ping chen. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Summons, #2 Proposed Summons, #3 Proposed Summons, #4 Exhibit A- Acknowledgement of Receipt Request, #5 Exhibit B-USCIS online status, #6 Exhibit C- USCIS announcement "last-in first-out rule", #7 Civil Cover Sheet) (Wu, King Lun) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
