J.D Workforce, Inc. v. Gafoor et al
Plaintiff: J.D Workforce, Inc.
Defendant: Mohamed J. Gafoor and ABC Company
Case Number: 1:2022cv07930
Filed: December 28, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Nature of Suit: Defend Trade Secrets Act (of 2016)
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 30, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 28, 2022 Filing 7 Proposed Summons. by J.D Workforce, Inc. (Kataev, Emanuel)
December 28, 2022 Filing 6 Civil Cover Sheet.. by J.D Workforce, Inc. (Kataev, Emanuel)
December 28, 2022 Filing 5 AFFIDAVIT/DECLARATION in Support re #2 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order by Order to show cause pursuantto Fed. R. Civ. P. 65 and 18 U.S.C. 1836(A) MOTION for Preliminary Injunction by Order to show cause pursuantto Fed. R. Civ. P. 65 and 18 U.S.C. 1836(A) MOTION for Permanent Injunction by Order to show cause pursuantto Fed. R. Civ. P. 65 and 18 U.S.C. 1836(A) filed by J.D Workforce, Inc.. (Kataev, Emanuel)
December 28, 2022 Filing 4 AFFIDAVIT/DECLARATION in Support re #2 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order by Order to show cause pursuantto Fed. R. Civ. P. 65 and 18 U.S.C. 1836(A) MOTION for Preliminary Injunction by Order to show cause pursuantto Fed. R. Civ. P. 65 and 18 U.S.C. 1836(A) MOTION for Permanent Injunction by Order to show cause pursuantto Fed. R. Civ. P. 65 and 18 U.S.C. 1836(A) filed by J.D Workforce, Inc.. (Kataev, Emanuel)
December 28, 2022 Filing 3 MEMORANDUM in Support re #2 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order by Order to show cause pursuantto Fed. R. Civ. P. 65 and 18 U.S.C. 1836(A) MOTION for Preliminary Injunction by Order to show cause pursuantto Fed. R. Civ. P. 65 and 18 U.S.C. 1836(A) MOTION for Permanent Injunction by Order to show cause pursuantto Fed. R. Civ. P. 65 and 18 U.S.C. 1836(A) filed by J.D Workforce, Inc.. (Kataev, Emanuel)
December 28, 2022 Filing 2 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order by Order to show cause pursuantto Fed. R. Civ. P. 65 and 18 U.S.C. 1836(A), MOTION for Preliminary Injunction by Order to show cause pursuantto Fed. R. Civ. P. 65 and 18 U.S.C. 1836(A), MOTION for Permanent Injunction by Order to show cause pursuantto Fed. R. Civ. P. 65 and 18 U.S.C. 1836(A) by J.D Workforce, Inc.. (Kataev, Emanuel)
December 28, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against ABC Company, Mohamed J. Gafoor filing fee $ 402, receipt number ANYEDC-16264055 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -NO,, filed by J.D Workforce, Inc.. (Kataev, Emanuel)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: J.D Workforce, Inc. v. Gafoor et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: J.D Workforce, Inc.
Represented By: Emanuel Kataev
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mohamed J. Gafoor
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ABC Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?