Miller et al v. City of New York et al
| Stanford Miller, Cesar Salas Valdez, Fabion Lewis and George Numfor |
| City of New York and David Do |
| 1:2023cv00065 |
| January 5, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Pamela K Chen |
| Robert M Levy |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 25, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by George Numfor, Stanford Miller, Fabion Lewis, Cesar Salas Valdez. All Defendants. (Romer-Friedman, Peter) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by Kerri Ann Devine on behalf of All Defendants (aty to be noticed) (Devine, Kerri) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Christopher K. Leung on behalf of All Plaintiffs (aty to be noticed) (Leung, Christopher) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Bernadette Dino Jentsch on behalf of All Plaintiffs (aty to be noticed) (Jentsch, Bernadette) |
| Filing 8 Summons Issued as to City of New York, David Do, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. (Attachments: #1 Do-Summons) (ML) |
| Filing 7 Proposed Summons. Re #1 Complaint, by Fabion Lewis, Stanford Miller, George Numfor, Cesar Salas Valdez (Romer-Friedman, Peter) |
| Filing 6 Proposed Summons. Re #1 Complaint, by Fabion Lewis, Stanford Miller, George Numfor, Cesar Salas Valdez (Romer-Friedman, Peter) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Michael Noah Litrownik on behalf of Fabion Lewis, Stanford Miller, George Numfor, Cesar Salas Valdez (aty to be noticed) (Litrownik, Michael) |
| Filing 4 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (KD) |
| Filing 3 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (KD) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Pamela K. Chen and Magistrate Judge Robert M. Levy. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (KD) |
| Your proposed summons was not issued for one of the following reasons: The CLERK OF COURT NAME needs to be Updated/Corrected. Please correct and resubmit using Proposed Summons/Civil Cover Sheet. (KD) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Belinda Luu on behalf of All Plaintiffs (aty to be noticed) (Luu, Belinda) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filing fee $ 402, receipt number ANYEDC-16279680 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -YES,, filed by George Numfor, Stanford Miller, Fabion Lewis, Cesar Salas Valdez. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons for the City of New York, #3 Proposed Summons for Commissioner David Do) (Romer-Friedman, Peter) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
