Sparbar Ltd et al v. Lam et al
| Sparbar Ltd and Jasvinder Singh |
| Kenny Lam and Lin Kuan Liang Nicholas |
| 1:2023cv00184 |
| January 11, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Carol Bagley Amon |
| Vera M Scanlon |
| Assault Libel & Slander |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 20, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
SCHEDULING ORDER: An In-Person Initial Conference is scheduled for 5/10/2023 at 10:30 AM before Magistrate Judge Vera M. Scanlon in Courtroom 13A South. The parties must complete the attached Joint Proposed Case Management Plan (CMP) and file it on ECF no later than 4/25/2023. In the event that any Defendant(s) has not answered or otherwise appeared, Plaintiffs must also mail a copy of this Order, its attachment and the full docket to the last known mailing address(es) for such Defendant(s) and file proof on ECF by the CMP filing date. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Vera M. Scanlon on 1/20/2023. (MG)
|
| Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Kenny Lam, Lin Kuan Liang Nicholas. (Attachments: #1 Lam Summons) (EF) |
| Filing 5 Proposed Summons. by Jasvinder Singh, Sparbar Ltd (Attachments: #1 Proposed Summons) (Bronsnick, Andrew) |
| Filing 4 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (KD) |
| Filing 3 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (KD) |
| Your proposed summons was not issued for one of the following reasons: The Date Section and Deputy Clerk Signature Sections Should be left blank for the Clerk to issue.Please correct and resubmit using Proposed Summons/Civil Cover Sheet. (KD) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Carol Bagley Amon and Magistrate Judge Vera M. Scanlon. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (KD) |
| Filing 2 Proposed Summons.Civil Cover Sheet.. by Jasvinder Singh, Sparbar Ltd (Attachments: #1 Proposed Summons, #2 Proposed Summons) (Bronsnick, Andrew) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Plaintiffs filing fee $ 402, receipt number ANYEDC-16299237 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -No,, filed by Sparbar Ltd, Jasvinder Singh. (Bronsnick, Andrew) |
| Notice: Re: Incomplete Civil Cover Sheet. The Clerk's Office cannot assign this case without a completed Civil Cover Sheet. Please submit a Completed 2 Page Form Civil Cover Sheet. This event can be found under the event Other Documents - Proposed Summons/Civil Cover Sheet. (KD) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
