Gao v. Garland et al
| Caixia Gao |
| US Attorney General Merrick Garland, Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas, Director Brian Meier, USCIS Director Ur M. Jaddou and Alejandro Mayorkas |
| 1:2023cv00227 |
| January 12, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Hector Gonzalez |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 12, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
ORDER DISMISSING CASE pursuant to the parties' stipulation of voluntary dismissal. See ECF No. #7 . Ordered by Judge Hector Gonzalez on 3/12/2023. (BH)
|
| Filing 7 STIPULATION of Dismissal Without Prejudice by Merrick Garland, Ur M. Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas, Brian Meier (Greene-Delgado, Sean) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Caixia Gao. Merrick Garland served on 1/19/2023, answer due 3/20/2023; Ur M. Jaddou served on 1/19/2023, answer due 3/20/2023; Alejandro Mayorkas served on 1/19/2023, answer due 3/20/2023; Brian Meier served on 1/19/2023, answer due 3/20/2023. (Idowu, Adedayo) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Sean Patrick Greene-Delgado on behalf of All Defendants (aty to be noticed) (Greene-Delgado, Sean) |
|
SCHEDULING ORDER: Defendants are directed to file an answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's complaint on or before March 24, 2023. If Defendants intend to move to dismiss the complaint, then Defendants shall file by that date a pre-motion letter summarizing the basis for their motion to dismiss, as required by Section IV.A of the Court's Individual Practices. Plaintiff shall file a responsive letter on or before March 31, 2023. Ordered by Judge Hector Gonzalez on 1/23/2023. (BH)
|
| Filing 4 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (SR) |
| Filing 3 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (SR) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to All Defendants, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (SR) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Hector Gonzalez. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (SR) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Writ of Mandamus against Merrick Garland, Ur M. Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas, Brian Meier filing fee $ 402, receipt number ANYEDC-16305597 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -Yes,, filed by Caixia Gao. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Summons Proposed Summons, #2 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Exhibit Exhibit 1, #4 Exhibit Exhibit 2, #5 Exhibit Exhibit 3, #6 Exhibit Exhibit 4) (Idowu, Adedayo) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
