Argueta v. Mr. Stax, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Tatiana Argueta
Defendant: Mr. Stax, Inc., BRONX PANCAKES, INC., FORTY SIX NINETEEN COMPANY, INC., FORTY SIX O SEVEN COMPANY, INC., STAMFORD PANCAKES, INC, Timothy Mulson and Stamford Pancakes, Inc.
Case Number: 1:2023cv00508
Filed: January 24, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Presiding Judge: Robert M Levy
Referring Judge: Kiyo A Matsumoto
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 7, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 7, 2023 Filing 14 COMPLAINT against All Defendants Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -YES,, filed by Tatiana Argueta. (Errington, Clela)
March 1, 2023 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Robert M. Levy: Clela Errington, Amanda Blair. Case management order entered. Fact discovery deadline 5/31/23. Next conference 6/1/23 at 11:30 (tel)(close of discovery). Initial Conference Hearing held on 3/1/2023 (Levy, Robert)
February 22, 2023 Filing 13 NOTICE of Appearance by Joshua D Nadreau on behalf of All Defendants (notification declined or already on case) (Nadreau, Joshua)
February 22, 2023 Opinion or Order ORDER granting #12 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. The attorney shall register for ECF, registration is available online at www.pacer.gov. Once registered, the attorney shall file a notice of appearance and ensure that s/he receives electronic notification of activity in this case. Also, the attorney shall ensure the 150 admission fee be submitted to the Clerks Office via filing the event Pro Hac Vice Filing Fee. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Robert M. Levy on 2/22/2023. (AM)
February 13, 2023 Filing 12 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice Filing fee $ 150, receipt number ANYEDC-16404199. by Bronx Pancakes, Inc., Forty Six Nineteen Company, Inc., Forty Six O Seven Company, Inc., Mr. Stax, Inc., Timothy Mulson, Stamford Pancakes, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit Affidavit of Joshua Nadreau) (Nadreau, Joshua)
February 3, 2023 Filing 11 Proposed Scheduling Order - Initial Conference Questionnaire by Bronx Pancakes, Inc., Forty Six Nineteen Company, Inc., Forty Six O Seven Company, Inc., Mr. Stax, Inc., Timothy Mulson, Stamford Pancakes, Inc. (Blair, Amanda)
February 3, 2023 Opinion or Order ORDER RE #10 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Motion denied. Under Local Rule 1.3(c), an applicant to appear pro hac vice must file a certificate of the court for each of the states in which the applicant is a member of the bar, which has been issued within thirty (30) days of filing and states that the applicant is a member in good standing of the bar of that state court. The certificate of good standing submitted with this motion is dated December 30, 2022, which is more than 30 days ago. The movant is directed to resubmit the motion with a timely certificate. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Robert M. Levy on 2/3/2023. (JM)
February 2, 2023 Filing 10 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice Filing fee $ 150, receipt number ANYEDC-16372335. by Bronx Pancakes, Inc., Forty Six Nineteen Company, Inc., Forty Six O Seven Company, Inc., Mr. Stax, Inc., Timothy Mulson, Stamford Pancakes, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit Affidavit of Joshua Nadreau) (Nadreau, Joshua)
January 31, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 9 SCHEDULING ORDER: An initial conference by telephone has been scheduled for March 1, 2023 at 4:30 p.m., before the Honorable Robert M. Levy, United States Magistrate Judge at (888) 684-8852; Access Code #: 6223489. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Robert M. Levy on 1/31/2023. (Attachments: #1 IC QUESTIONNAIRE, #2 INDIVIDUAL RULES) (JM)
January 30, 2023 Filing 8 ANSWER to Complaint /Plaintiff's Summons With Notice by Bronx Pancakes, Inc., Forty Six Nineteen Company, Inc., Forty Six O Seven Company, Inc., Mr. Stax, Inc., Timothy Mulson, Stamford Pancakes, Inc.. (Blair, Amanda)
January 26, 2023 Filing 7 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (SR)
January 26, 2023 Filing 6 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (SR)
January 26, 2023 This case has been opened in the Eastern District of New York. If you plan to continue representing your client(s), you must be admitted to practice before this court. You must do so by applying for Pro Hac Vice or permanent admission. To apply for Pro Hac Vice admission, you must first register for an ECF login and password. Please visit the Court's website at www.nyed.uscourts.gov/attorney-admissions for guidance. Once registered, you must electronically file a Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice. You must pay the required pro hac vice fee online. (SR)
January 25, 2023 Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Michael J. Borrelli on behalf of Tatiana Argueta (aty to be noticed) (Borrelli, Michael)
January 25, 2023 Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Alexander T. Coleman on behalf of Tatiana Argueta (aty to be noticed) (Coleman, Alexander)
January 25, 2023 Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Clela Alice Errington on behalf of Tatiana Argueta (aty to be noticed) (Errington, Clela)
January 24, 2023 Case Assigned to Judge Kiyo A. Matsumoto and Magistrate Judge Robert M. Levy. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (SR)
January 24, 2023 Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by BRONX PANCAKES, INC., FORTY SIX NINETEEN COMPANY, INC., FORTY SIX O SEVEN COMPANY, INC., Mr. Stax, Inc., Timothy Mulson, STAMFORD PANCAKES, INC (Blair, Amanda)
January 24, 2023 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by All Defendants from Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of Queens, case number 700176/2023. ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ANYEDC-16339790) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (Blair, Amanda)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Argueta v. Mr. Stax, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tatiana Argueta
Represented By: Alexander T. Coleman
Represented By: Michael J. Borrelli
Represented By: Clela Alice Errington
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mr. Stax, Inc.
Represented By: Amanda Blair
Represented By: Joshua D Nadreau
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: BRONX PANCAKES, INC.
Represented By: Amanda Blair
Represented By: Joshua D Nadreau
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: FORTY SIX NINETEEN COMPANY, INC.
Represented By: Amanda Blair
Represented By: Joshua D Nadreau
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: FORTY SIX O SEVEN COMPANY, INC.
Represented By: Amanda Blair
Represented By: Joshua D Nadreau
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: STAMFORD PANCAKES, INC
Represented By: Amanda Blair
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Timothy Mulson
Represented By: Amanda Blair
Represented By: Joshua D Nadreau
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Stamford Pancakes, Inc.
Represented By: Joshua D Nadreau
Represented By: Amanda Blair
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?