Saidi v. U.S. Federal Government et al
Plaintiff: Kasim M. Saidi
Defendant: C.I.A. Federal Government, Monawar Anwari and Special Agent Howard Stern
Case Number: 1:2023cv00706
Filed: January 30, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Presiding Judge: Lois Bloom
Referring Judge: Diane Gujarati
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 27, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 27, 2023 Filing 8 CLERK'S JUDGMENT that this action is dismissed as frivolous, See 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B)(i); see also Lamb v. Cuomo, 698 F. App'x 1, 2 (2d Cir. 2017) ("A claim is frivolous 'where it lacks an arguable basis either in law or in fact.'") (quoting Neitzke v. Williams, 490 U.S. 319, 325 (1989)); Hakaniemi v. Zuckerberg, No. 21-CV-04345, 2021 WL 3566221, at *1 (E.D.N.Y. Aug. 12, 2021); that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith; and that in forma pauperis status is denied for purposes of an appeal; See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). Signed by Jalitza Poveda, on behalf of Brenna B. Mahoney, Clerk of Court on 2/27/2023. (Copy of Judgment and Appeals packet mailed to Pro Se). (IH)
February 24, 2023 Opinion or Order ORDER DISMISSING CASE -- Pro se Plaintiff's Request to Proceed in forma pauperis, see ECF No. 1, is granted solely for the purpose of this Order. Upon review of the #2 Complaint and the #3 Amended Complaint, which -- even liberally construed -- lack an arguable basis either in law or in fact, see generally ECF Nos. 2, 3, the Court dismisses this action as frivolous. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B)(i); see also Lamb v. Cuomo, 698 F. App'x 1, 2 (2d Cir. 2017) ("A claim is frivolous 'where it lacks an arguable basis either in law or in fact.'") (quoting Neitzke v. Williams, 490 U.S. 319, 325 (1989)); Hakaniemi v. Zuckerberg, No. 21-CV-04345, 2021 WL 3566221, at *1 (E.D.N.Y. Aug. 12, 2021). Notwithstanding Plaintiff's pro se status, such dismissal is without leave to amend as the Court finds that amendment would be futile. See Hakaniemi, 2021 WL 3566221, at *2 (dismissing pro se plaintiff's complaint as frivolous, denying leave to amend where complaint was "devoid of any arguable basis in fact or in law, defects which cannot be cured by amendment," and collecting cases). The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith and therefore denies in forma pauperis status for purposes of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment accordingly, to close this case, and to mail a copy of this Order to Plaintiff. Ordered by Judge Diane Gujarati on 2/24/2023. (KA)
January 31, 2023 Filing 7 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (KD)
January 31, 2023 Filing 6 Case transferred in from District of New York Southern; Case Number 1:23-cv-00386. Original file certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received.
January 26, 2023 Mailed a copy of #4 Order, to Kasim M. Saidi 411 Van Siclen Ave. Brooklyn, NY 11207. (dsh) [Transferred from New York Southern on 1/31/2023.]
January 25, 2023 Filing 5 PRO SE CONSENT TO RECEIVE ELECTRONIC SERVICE. The following party: Kasim M. Saidi consents to receive electronic service via the ECF system. Document filed by Kasim M. Saidi.(sc) [Transferred from New York Southern on 1/31/2023.]
January 24, 2023 CASE TRANSFERRED OUT ELECTRONICALLY from the U.S.D.C. Southern District of New York to the United States District Court - District of Eastern District of New York.(rdz) [Transferred from New York Southern on 1/31/2023.]
January 24, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 4 TRANSFER ORDER: The Court directs the Clerk of Court to transfer this action to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York. 28 U.S.C. 1404(a). Whether Plaintiff should be permitted to proceed further without prepayment of fees is a determination to be made by the transferee court. Summonses shall not issue from this court. This order closes this action in this court. The Court certifies, under 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3), that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Laura Taylor Swain on 1/24/23) (rdz) Transmission to Office of the Clerk of Court for processing. [Transferred from New York Southern on 1/31/2023.]
January 20, 2023 Filing 3 AMENDED COMPLAINT, Re: amending #2 Complaint against C.I.A. Federal Government, Howard Stern.Document filed by Kasim M. Saidi. Related document: #2 Complaint.(sc) Modified on 1/20/2023 (rdz). [Transferred from New York Southern on 1/31/2023.]
January 19, 2023 NOTICE OF CASE REASSIGNMENT - SUA SPONTE to Judge Laura Taylor Swain. Judge Unassigned is no longer assigned to the case. (sac) [Transferred from New York Southern on 1/31/2023.]
January 12, 2023 Filing 2 COMPLAINT against Monawar Anwari, Howard Stern, U.S. Federal Government. Document filed by Mohammad Rasim Saidi..(rdz) (Main Document 2 replaced on 1/17/2023) (rdz). [Transferred from New York Southern on 1/31/2023.]
January 12, 2023 Filing 1 REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS. Document filed by Mohammad Rasim Saidi..(rdz) Modified on 1/17/2023 (rdz). [Transferred from New York Southern on 1/31/2023.]
January 12, 2023 Case Designated ECF. (rdz) [Transferred from New York Southern on 1/31/2023.]

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Saidi v. U.S. Federal Government et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kasim M. Saidi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: C.I.A. Federal Government
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Monawar Anwari
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Special Agent Howard Stern
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?