Lewis v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc. et al
| 1:2023cv00857 |
| March 27, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Brooklyn Office |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
62
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER. The defendants' motions to dismiss are granted. Because the Court dismisses this action for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction, the dismissal is without prejudice. The Court will allow the plaintiff another oppo rtunity to amend his complaint, but only as to certain claims. Generally, a court should grant a pro se plaintiff leave to amend [i]f a liberal reading of the pleading gives any indication that a valid claim might be stated. The plaintiff's ame nded complaint is due within 30 days of the date of this order. The plaintiff is encouraged to contact the Federal Pro Se Legal Assistance Project for assistance with filing his amended complaint. If the plaintiff does not amend the complaint within 30 days, judgment dismissing the action as to the moving defendants will enter. Ordered by Judge Ann M. Donnelly on 3/27/2024. (DG)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Lewis v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc. et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
