Ortiz v. The City of New York et al
Plaintiff: ERIC ORTIZ
Defendant: CITY OF NEW YORK, New York City Police Department, New York City Department of Correction, John Doe Police Officers 1-5, JOHN DOE CORRECTIONS OFFICERS 1-5 and The City of New York
Case Number: 1:2023cv01164
Filed: February 13, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Presiding Judge: Pamela K Chen
Referring Judge: Taryn A Merkl
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 21, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 21, 2023 Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Eric Ortiz. New York City Police Department served on 2/28/2023, answer due 3/21/2023. (Ripka, Alan)
March 21, 2023 Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Eric Ortiz. New York City Department of Correction served on 3/14/2023, answer due 4/4/2023. (Ripka, Alan)
March 21, 2023 Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Eric Ortiz. The City of New York served on 2/28/2023, answer due 3/21/2023. (Ripka, Alan)
March 21, 2023 Opinion or Order ORDER: The Motion for Extension of Time #6 is granted. Defendant City of New York shall answer, move, or otherwise respond to the Complaint by 5/22/2023. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Taryn A. Merkl on 3/21/2023. (SA)
March 20, 2023 Filing 6 Letter MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, or Otherwise Respond to the Complaint by The City of New York. (Gottstein, Evan)
March 2, 2023 Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Zachary Naidich on behalf of Eric Ortiz (aty to be noticed) (Naidich, Zachary)
February 17, 2023 Filing 4 Summons Issued as to New York City Department of Correction, New York City Police Department, The City of New York. (KD)
February 17, 2023 Filing 3 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (KD)
February 17, 2023 Filing 2 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (KD)
February 17, 2023 Case Assigned to Judge Pamela K. Chen and Magistrate Judge Taryn A. Merkl. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (KD)
February 13, 2023 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filing fee $ 402, receipt number ANYEDC-16403084 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -YES,, filed by ERIC ORTIZ. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Summons, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (Ripka, Alan)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ortiz v. The City of New York et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: ERIC ORTIZ
Represented By: Alan Seth Ripka
Represented By: Zachary Naidich
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CITY OF NEW YORK
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: New York City Police Department
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: New York City Department of Correction
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Doe Police Officers 1-5
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: JOHN DOE CORRECTIONS OFFICERS 1-5
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: The City of New York
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?