Adams v. The Luwifren Corporation et al
| Michael Adams |
| The Luwifren Corporation and Gnocca Lovers LLC |
| 1:2023cv01247 |
| February 16, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Vera M Scanlon |
| Eric N Vitaliano |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1201 Civil Rights (Disability) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 16, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 Summons Issued as to All Defendants. (Attachments: #1 Gnocca Lovers LLC) (SR) |
SCHEDULING ORDER: Due to a conflict in the Court's calendar, the 6/21/2023 Initial Conference is rescheduled for 6/14/2023 at 10:40 AM in person in Courtroom 13A South before Magistrate Judge Vera M. Scanlon. The CMP at #7 is due by 5/30/2023. In the event that any Defendants have not answered or otherwise appeared, Plaintiff must also mail a copy of this Order, the attachment at #7 and the full docket to the last known mailing addresses for such Defendants and file proof on ECF by the CMP filing date. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Vera M. Scanlon on 3/5/2023. (JR)
|
|
Filing 7
SCHEDULING ORDER: An Initial Conference is set for 6/21/2023 at 11:00 AM in person in Courtroom 13A South before Magistrate Judge Vera M. Scanlon. The parties must complete the attached Joint Proposed Case Management Plan (CMP) and file it on ECF no later than 6/6/2023. In the event that any Defendants have not answered or otherwise appeared, Plaintiff must also mail a copy of this Order, its attachment and the full docket to the last known mailing addresses for such Defendants and file proof on ECF by the CMP filing date. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Vera M. Scanlon on 2/27/2023. (JR)
|
| Filing 6 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (SR) |
| Filing 5 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (SR) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Eric N. Vitaliano and Magistrate Judge Vera M. Scanlon. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (SR) |
| Filing 4 Proposed Summons. by Michael Adams (Tucek, Jennifer) |
| Filing 3 Proposed Summons. Re #1 Complaint by Michael Adams (Tucek, Jennifer) |
| Filing 2 Civil Cover Sheet.. Re #1 Complaint by Michael Adams (Tucek, Jennifer) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Gnocca Lovers LLC, The Luwifren Corporation filing fee $ 402, receipt number ANYEDC-16415678 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -YES,, filed by Michael Adams. (Tucek, Jennifer) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
