Timalsina v. Mayorkas et al
Manish Timalsina |
Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas and Director Ur M. Jaddou |
1:2023cv01370 |
February 21, 2023 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
Kiyo A Matsumoto |
Other Immigration Actions |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 13, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Kimberly Francis on behalf of All Defendants (aty to be noticed) (Francis, Kimberly) |
Filing 3 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Manish Timalsina. Ur M. Jaddou served on 3/7/2023, answer due 5/8/2023; Alejandro Mayorkas served on 3/7/2023, answer due 5/8/2023. (Altman, Stuart) |
Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Ur M. Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (AM) |
Case Assigned to Judge Kiyo A. Matsumoto. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (AM) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Manish Timalsina against Ur M. Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas filing fee $ 402, receipt number ANYEDC-16428804 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -Yes,, filed by Manish Timalsina. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Summons Proposed Summons, #2 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Exhibit I-589 Receipt) (Altman, Stuart) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.