Wangsari v. New York State Child Support Services et al
| Erwin Wangsari |
| New York State Child Support Services and New York State Queens County Family Court |
| 1:2023cv02530 |
| March 29, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Vera M Scanlon |
| Eric N Vitaliano |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 8, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 Documents submitted by Erwin Wangsari. Filing includes IFP application, copies of Notice of Objection to Denial of Writ Habeas Corpus, Notice of Warrant, Notice to Appear, and Notice for Dismissal for Failure to Appear re: state case. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (JT) |
| Filing 5 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Erwin Wangsari. (JT) |
Filing 4
ORDER: By letter dated March 29, 2023, the Clerk of Court informed Plaintiff that he must either pay the filing fee or file an IFP application within 14 days in order to proceed with this action. See Notice of Deficient Filing, Dkt. #2 . To date, Plaintiff has not paid the filing fee or filed an IFP application. There has been no response to the Clerk's letter, nor has it been returned as undeliverable by the Post Office. In light of Plaintiffs pro se status, the Court extends the time to comply with the Notice of Deficient Filing. In order to proceed with this action, Plaintiff must either pay the $402 filing fee to the Clerk of Court of the Eastern District of New York or return the completed IFP application within 30 days from the date of this Order. No response is required by Defendants at this time. No further extension will be granted without good cause shown. If Plaintiff fails to comply with this Order within the time allowed, this action will be dismissed without prejudice. The Clerk of Court is directed to send a copy of this Order and the IFP application to Plaintiff and note the mailing on the docket. The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). SO Ordered by Judge Eric N. Vitaliano on 4/27/2023. (JT)
|
| Filing 3 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (TPL) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF DEFICIENT FILING, litigant notified of deficiency(s) that must be corrected within fourteen (14) days. Mailed out on 4/6/23. (TPL) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against New York State Child Support Services, New York State Queens County Family Court, filed by Erwin Wangsari. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (TPL) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
