Benjamin v. Alwin et al
| Jefferey Benjamin |
| Ritchie Alwin and Command 077 NYPD 297 |
| 1:2023cv02645 |
| April 4, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| LaShann DeArcy Hall |
| Ramon E Reyes |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 21, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 AFFIRMATION OF SERVICE by Jefferey Benjamin. (EG) |
| Filing 3 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (TPL) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Jefferey Benjamin. (TPL) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Ritchie Alwin, Command 077 NYPD 297, filed by Jefferey Benjamin. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (TPL) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
