Li v. USCIS Office of the General Counsel et al
| Ru Li |
| USCIS Office of the General Counsel, USCIS Attorney General of the USA and United States Attorney for the Eastern District of New York |
| 1:2023cv02693 |
| April 11, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Ann M Donnelly |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 15, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal dated 5/10/23 by Ru Li, plaintiff pro se having received the interview notification from defendant. (RG) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Ru Li. served on 4/14/2023, answer due 6/13/2023. (RG) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Mary M. Dickman on behalf of All Defendants (aty to be noticed) (Dickman, Mary) |
| Filing 3 FILING FEE: $ 402.00, receipt number 100006171 (TPL) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to USCIS Attorney General of the USA, USCIS Office of the General Counsel, United States Attorney for the Eastern District of New York, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (TPL) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against USCIS Attorney General of the USA, USCIS Office of the General Counsel, United States Attorney for the Eastern District of New York, filed by Ru Li. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (TPL) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
