Singh v. USCIS et al
| Baldev Singh |
| USCIS, US Department of Homeland Security, National Visa Center (NVC) Department of State, US Department of State and U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) |
| 1:2023cv03261 |
| May 1, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Nina R Morrison |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 551 Administrative Procedure Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 28, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to Order to Show Cause (Federal),, by National Visa Center (NVC) Department of State, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS), US Department of Homeland Security, US Department of State. (Stamatelos, Paulina) |
| Incorrect Case/Entry Information re #7 Notice of Appearance of Diane C. Leonardo. The document was filed in this case in error and AUSA Leonardo is not appearing in this action. Please disregard. (TLH) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Diane C. Leonardo on behalf of All Defendants (aty to be noticed) (Leonardo, Diane) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Paulina Stamatelos on behalf of All Defendants (aty to be noticed) (Stamatelos, Paulina) |
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE and Electronic Service upon the US Attorneys Office: (1) The United States Attorney, as attorney for Respondents, shall show cause before this Court why a writ of mandamus should not be issued by filing a return to the petition; (2) within sixty (60) days, the United States Attorney shall serve a copy of their return on Petitioner herein and shall file the original thereof, with proof of service, with the Clerk of the Court; and (3) Petitioner shall file a reply, if any, with the Clerk of the Court within thirty (30) days of receiving the return and serve a copy on Respondents. Ordered by Judge Nina R. Morrison on 5/2/2023. (LK)
|
| Filing 5 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (SR) |
| Filing 4 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (SR) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to All Defendants. (SR) |
| Filing 2 Proposed Summons. by Baldev Singh (Singh, Dalbir) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT 1 against All Defendants filing fee $ 402, receipt number ANYEDC-16652410 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -YES,, filed by Baldev Singh. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits A-E, #2 Civil Case Cover Sheet) (Singh, Dalbir) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Nina R. Morrison. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (SR) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
