Santander Bank, N.A. v. Skyprime Transportation, LLC et al
| Santander Bank, N.A. |
| Skyprime Transportation, LLC and Bahati Mwapachu |
| 1:2023cv03397 |
| May 5, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Negotiable Instrument |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 5, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made. (LJ) |
| Filing 4 Proposed Summons. Re #1 Complaint,, by Santander Bank, N.A. (Katz, Clifford) |
| Filing 3 Civil Cover Sheet.. Re #1 Complaint,, by Santander Bank, N.A. (Katz, Clifford) |
| Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Santander Bank, N.A. (Katz, Clifford) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Santander Bank, N.A. filing fee $ 402, receipt number ANYEDC-16670400 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -Yes,, filed by Santander Bank, N.A.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Ex. 1- Note, #2 Exhibit Ex. 2- Schedule 000, #3 Exhibit Ex. 3- Schedule 001, #4 Exhibit Ex. 4- Schedule 002, #5 Exhibit Ex. 5- Guaranty, #6 Exhibit Ex. 6- Title Documents and Lien Report, #7 Exhibit Ex. 7- October 2022 Default Notice, #8 Exhibit Ex. 8- March 2023 Demand Letter) (Katz, Clifford) Modified on 5/5/2023 (LJ). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
