Farjana et al v. Renaud et al
Dinath Farjana and Md Nazim Ahmed |
Acting Director Tracy Renaud, Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas, US Attorney General Merrick B. Garland, National Benefits Center, John Does 1-10, Jane Does 1-10 and ABC Agency 1-10 |
1:2023cv03403 |
May 5, 2023 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
Dora Lizette Irizarry |
Other Immigration Actions |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 31, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Md Nazim Ahmed, Dinath Farjana. Merrick B. Garland served on 5/16/2023, answer due 7/17/2023; Alejandro Mayorkas served on 5/16/2023, answer due 7/17/2023; National Benefits Center served on 5/16/2023, answer due 7/17/2023; Tracy Renaud served on 5/16/2023, answer due 7/17/2023. (Gharti-Chhetry, Khagendra) |
Incorrect Entry Information: re #6 Affidavit. A message was left to notify the attorney of the incorrect filing event used in the entry. The attorney for pltff. is directed to re file the docket entry event correctly using the event Summons Returned Executed as to USA found under Service of Process. If further help is needed please contact the Court's Help Desk at 718-613-2610. (ML) |
Filing 6 AFFIDAVIT/AFFIRMATION of service by Md Nazim Ahmed, Dinath Farjana (Gharti-Chhetry, Khagendra) |
ORDER directing proof of service re #1 Complaint --- Plaintiff is directed to file proof of service on Defendants of the summons and complaint by MAY 30, 2023. SO ORDERED by Judge Dora Lizette Irizarry on 5/23/2023. (CC) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Philip R. DePaul on behalf of Merrick B. Garland, Alejandro Mayorkas, National Benefits Center, Tracy Renaud (aty to be noticed) (DePaul, Philip) |
Filing 4 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (SR) |
Filing 3 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (SR) |
Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Merrick B. Garland, Alejandro Mayorkas, National Benefits Center, Tracy Renaud. (SR) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Writ of Mandamus against ABC Agency 1-10, Merrick B. Garland, Jane Does 1-10, John Does 1-10, Alejandro Mayorkas, National Benefits Center, Tracy Renaud filing fee $ 402, receipt number ANYEDC-16671414 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -yes,, filed by Md Nazim Ahmed, Dinath Farjana. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons) (Gharti-Chhetry, Khagendra) |
Case Assigned to Judge Dora Lizette Irizarry. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (SR) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.