Pinkhasov v. Vernikov
Plaintiff: Anzhela Pinkhasov and Angela Pink
Defendant: Inna Vernikov
Case Number: 1:2023cv03460
Filed: May 8, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Presiding Judge: Sanket J Bulsara
Referring Judge: Dora Lizette Irizarry
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 14, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 14, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 13 SCHEDULING ORDER: A telephonic initial conference will be held at 12:30 P.M. on 7/20/2023 before Magistrate Judge Sanket J. Bulsara. The parties are directed to call the toll-free number 877-336-1274. The access code is 6534420. The parties shall dial in five (5) minutes before the conference. Counsel are directed to complete the attached Rule 26(f) Report and electronically file same with the Court no later than 7/18/2023. Should the parties wish to adopt a plan for discovery different from the structure in the Rule 26(f) Report, they may do so only if they file a letter explaining why such a plan is appropriate in this case. Upon receipt of this email counsel shall confirm with each other of the date and time of this telephonic initial conference. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Sanket J. Bulsara on 6/14/2023. (EM)
June 14, 2023 Opinion or Order ORDER: The motion for extension of time to file answer #11 is granted. Defendant Inna Vernikov shall answer, move, or otherwise respond to the Amended Complaint by 7/14/2023. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Sanket J. Bulsara on 6/14/2023. (IS)
June 13, 2023 Filing 12 NOTICE of Appearance by Nicholas R. Ciappetta on behalf of All Defendants (notification declined or already on case) (EM)
June 13, 2023 Filing 11 First MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #6 Amended Complaint by Inna Vernikov. (Ciappetta, Nicholas)
June 13, 2023 Filing 10 First MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #6 Amended Complaint by Inna Vernikov. (Ciappetta, Nicholas)
June 7, 2023 Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Nicholas R. Ciappetta on behalf of Inna Vernikov (aty to be noticed) (Ciappetta, Nicholas)
June 7, 2023 Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Anzhela Pinkhasov. Inna Vernikov served on 6/5/2023, answer due 6/26/2023. (Nussbaum, Marcus)
May 30, 2023 Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Anzhela Pinkhasov. Inna Vernikov served on 5/24/2023, answer due 6/14/2023. (Nussbaum, Marcus)
May 9, 2023 Filing 6 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Inna Vernikov, filed by Anzhela Pinkhasov. (Nussbaum, Marcus)
May 8, 2023 Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Inna Vernikov. (ML)
May 8, 2023 Filing 4 Proposed Summons. Re Quality Control Check - Summons by Anzhela Pinkhasov (Nussbaum, Marcus)
May 8, 2023 Filing 3 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. ***PLEASE REFER TO ALL CORRECTIONS MADE ON THIS CASE**** (KD)
May 8, 2023 Filing 2 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (KD)
May 8, 2023 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against INNA VERNIKOV filing fee $ 402, receipt number ANYEDC-16678231 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -YES,, filed by ANZHELA PINKHASOV. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons) (Nussbaum, Marcus)
May 8, 2023 Case Assigned to Judge Dora Lizette Irizarry and Magistrate Judge Sanket J. Bulsara. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (KD)
May 8, 2023 Your proposed summons was not issued for one of the following reasons: THE CLERK OF COURT NAME NEEDS TO BE UPDATED/CORRECTED. Please correct and resubmit using Proposed Summons/Civil Cover Sheet. (KD)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Pinkhasov v. Vernikov
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Anzhela Pinkhasov
Represented By: Marcus A. Nussbaum
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Angela Pink
Represented By: Marcus A. Nussbaum
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Inna Vernikov
Represented By: Nicholas R. Ciappetta
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?