Brik v. McFarland et al
| Roman Brik |
| Janet McFarland and Court Officer Lavanco |
| 1:2023cv03507 |
| May 5, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Lois Bloom |
| Ann M Donnelly |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 29, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER dated 6/29/23 that for the reasons stated in the attached order, the plaintiff's complaint is dismissed and his motion for recusal is denied. The plaintiff is granted leave to amend to file an amended complaint within thirty days against Officer Lavanco only. ( Ordered by Judge Ann M Donnelly on 6/29/2023 ) c/m to petitioner (RG)
|
|
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to Judge Hector Gonzalez for all further proceedings. Judge Ann M Donnelly no longer assigned to case Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such.Ordered by Chief Judge Margo K. Brodie on 6/1/2023. (KD)
|
|
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to Judge Ann M Donnelly for all further proceedings. Judge Hector Gonzalez no longer assigned to case Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such.Ordered by Chief Judge Margo K. Brodie on 6/2/2023. (SR)
|
| Filing 8 Submissions by plaintiff Roman Brik, plaintiff pro se (via box.com) Motion to grant in forma pauperis status (Supplement) and to seal Financial Records. (Attachments: #1 Urgent Motion to Rescue/Disqualify Judge Donnelly and reassign the case, #2 proof of service of complaint) (RG) |
| Filing 7 Letter dated May 22, 2023 from Chief Judge Margo K. Brodie to Roman Brik. (WV) |
| Filing 6 Letter dated May 18, 2023 to Chief Judge Brodie from Roman Brik regarding disqualification/complaint, and unconstitutionally discriminatory practice of chaining Pro Se litigants to a specific judge. (TPL) |
| Filing 5 Letter dated May 18, 2023 to Hon. Congressman Jim Jordan and Members of the Committee from Roman Brik, requesting to investigate and impeach. (TPL) |
| Filing 4 MOTION for Recusal /Disqualify Judge Donnelly and Reassign the Case to an Impartial Judge by Roman Brik. (TPL) |
| Filing 3 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (TPL) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Roman Brik. (TPL) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Court Officer Lavanco, Janet McFarland, filed by Roman Brik. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (TPL) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
