Toussaint v. Apple Inc. et al
| Fritz Gerald Toussaint |
| Apple Inc., iCloud and iTunes |
| 1:2023cv03753 |
| May 18, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Lois Bloom |
| Diane Gujarati |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 5, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
MEMORANDUM & ORDER -- As set forth in the attached Memorandum & Order, Plaintiff is enjoined from filing any new action seeking in forma pauperis status in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York without first obtaining leave of Court. The injunction shall be implemented as set forth in the Memorandum & Order. The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith and therefore denies in forma pauperis status for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). Ordered by Judge Diane Gujarati on 7/5/2023. (KA)
|
| Filing 5 CLERK'S JUDGMENT that the Complaints in the four above-captioned actions are dismissed without prejudice, See 28 U.S.C. 1406(a); that Plaintiff is directed to SHOW CAUSE, in writing, by June 23, 2023, why he should not be enjoined from filing any new action seeking in forma pauperis status without first obtaining leave of Court; that Plaintiffs response must be filed in the lead case, No. 23-CV-03750 (DG) (LB); that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith; and that in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). Signed by Deputy Clerk Jalitza Poveda on behalf of Clerk of Court Brenna B. Mahoney, on 6/6/2023. (Copy of Judgment and appeals packet mailed to Pro Se). (IH) |
|
Filing 4
MEMORANDUM & ORDER -- As set forth in the attached Memorandum & Order, Toussaint v. Lyft, No. 23-CV-03750 (DG) (LB), Toussaint v. Home Depot, No. 23-CV-03751 (DG) (LB), Toussaint v. Bank of America, No. 23-CV-03752 (DG) (LB), and Toussaint v. Apple Inc., No. 23-CV-03753 (DG) (LB) are consolidated for the purpose of this Order; Plaintiff's requests to proceed in forma pauperis are granted; the Complaints are dismissed without prejudice, see 28 U.S.C. 1406(a); and Plaintiff is directed to SHOW CAUSE, in writing, by June 23, 2023, why he should not be enjoined from filing any new action seeking in forma pauperis status without first obtaining leave of Court. The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith and therefore denies in forma pauperis status for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment accordingly and to mail a copy of this Order to Plaintiff. Ordered by Judge Diane Gujarati on 6/2/2023. (KA)
|
| Filing 3 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (SR) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Fritz Gerald Toussaint. (SR) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Fritz Gerald Toussaint. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (SR) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
