Singh v. Barney's Service Station, Inc. et al
| SURINDER SINGH |
| BARNEY'S SERVICE STATION, INC. and ANTHONY PANVINI |
| 1:2023cv03881 |
| May 24, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Taryn A Merkl |
| Nina R Morrison |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 21, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
ORDER: Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer ( #10 ) is granted, on consent. In light of ongoing efforts to discuss settlement, the deadline for Defendants to answer, move, or otherwise respond to the complaint is extended to 9/1/2023. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Taryn A. Merkl on 7/21/2023. (JF)
|
| Filing 10 Second MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by Barney's Service Station, Inc., Anthony Panvini. (Felicione, Paul) |
|
ORDER: Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer ( #9 ) is granted, on consent. Defendants shall answer, move, or otherwise respond to the complaint by 8/1/2023. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Taryn A. Merkl on 6/29/2023. (JF)
|
| Filing 9 Letter MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, by Barney's Service Station, Inc., Anthony Panvini. (Felicione, Paul) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Paul J. Felicione on behalf of Barney's Service Station, Inc., Anthony Panvini (aty to be noticed) (Felicione, Paul) |
| Filing 7 AFFIDAVIT of Service for Summons & Complaint served on Barney's Service Station, Inc. on 6/8/2023, filed by Surinder Singh. (Olivieri, Daniel) |
| Filing 6 AFFIDAVIT of Service for Summons & Complaint served on Anthony Panvini on 6/8/2023, filed by Surinder Singh. (Olivieri, Daniel) |
| Filing 5 Summons Returned Unexecuted by Surinder Singh as to All Defendants. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit of Service PANVINI, #2 Affidavit of Service BARNEY'S SERVICE STATION) (Olivieri, Daniel) |
| Filing 4 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (SR) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to All Defendants. (SR) |
| Filing 2 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (SR) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Nina R. Morrison and Magistrate Judge Taryn A. Merkl. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (SR) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filing fee $ 402, receipt number ANYEDC-16732518 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -YES,, filed by SURINDER SINGH. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Summons, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (Olivieri, Daniel) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
