Richards v. Harvey
Ronaldo Richards |
George Harvey |
1:2023cv03914 |
May 22, 2023 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
Pamela K Chen |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 18, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 First MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by George Harvey. (Cieprisz, Margaret) |
ORDER: The Court is in receipt of Respondent's #6 request for a 45-day extension to file their response to the petition. The Court grants this request, and the response is now due on September 8, 2023. Ordered by Judge Pamela K. Chen on 7/18/2023. (KW) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Margaret Ann Cieprisz on behalf of George Harvey (aty to be noticed) (Cieprisz, Margaret) |
Filing 4 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE at Ronaldo Richards: Petitioner is granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Within sixty (60) days of receipt of this Order to Show Cause, Respondent shall serve a copy of the return on Petitioner herein and file the original thereof with the Court, together with proof of service. At the time of filing such return, Respondent shall electronically file the State Court Record, with no individual attachment to the entry exceeding 20 megabytes. Petitioner, within twenty-one (21) days of receipt of a copy of the return, shall file his reply, if any, with the Court. Ordered by Judge Pamela K. Chen on 5/26/2023. See attached for details. (FG) |
Filing 3 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (KD) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus , filed by Ronaldo Richards. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (KD) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Ronaldo Richards. (KD) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Richards v. Harvey | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Ronaldo Richards | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: George Harvey | |
Represented By: | QUEENS COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEYS OFFICE - GENERIC |
Represented By: | Margaret Ann Cieprisz |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.