Alonso v. D.P. Paving & Concrete Inc. et al
| Julian Andres Martinez Alonso |
| D.P. Paving & Concrete Inc., Daniel Prendergast and Marie Mahony |
| 1:2023cv04075 |
| June 1, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Sanket J Bulsara |
| LaShann DeArcy Hall |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 24, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
ORDER: The Motion for an Extension of Time to Answer #13 is denied without prejudice to renewal. Defendants seek to extend the time to answer, move, or otherwise respond to the Complaint. Defendant D.P. Paving & Concrete Inc.'s Answer was due on 7/3/2023. Because they are seeking to extend the time to answer after the time to do so has passed, Defendants must file a motion by 8/7/2023 that explains why, under the standards set forth in Enron Oil Corp. v. Diakuhara, 10 F.3d 90, 96 (2d Cir. 1993), a belated answer is permissible, and why a default should not be entered. Liang v. Home Reno Concepts, LLC, 803 F. App'x 444, 446 n.2 (2d Cir. 2020) ("If an answer is filed late, the court may treat the issue as one of default. See John v. Sotheby's, Inc., 141 F.R.D. 29, 35 (S.D.N.Y. 1992) ('The filing of a late answer is analogous to a motion to vacate a default.') (citing Meehan v. Snow, 652 F.2d 274, 276 (2d Cir. 1981)). The court may then consider whether, under the factors discussed in Enron Oil Corp. v. Diakuhara, 10 F.3d 90, 96 (2d Cir. 1993), default should be vacated."). So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Sanket J. Bulsara on 7/24/2023. (MD)
|
| Filing 13 Letter MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, by D.P. Paving & Concrete Inc., Marie Mahony, Daniel Prendergast. (Fleishman, Michael) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Appearance by Michael R. Fleishman on behalf of All Defendants (aty to be noticed) (Fleishman, Michael) |
|
Filing 11
SCHEDULING ORDER: A telephonic initial conference will be held at 11:00 A.M. on 10/27/2023 before Magistrate Judge Sanket J. Bulsara. The parties are directed to call the toll-free number 877-336-1274. The access code is 6534420. The parties shall dial in five (5) minutes before the conference. Plaintiff is directed to notify Defendants of this scheduling order at the time Defendants makes an appearance with in this matter. Counsel are also directed to complete the attached Rule 26(f) Report and electronically file same with the Court no later than 10/24/2023. Should the parties wish to adopt a plan for discovery different from the structure in the Rule 26(f) Report, they may do so only if they file a letter explaining why such a plan is appropriate in this case. Upon receipt of this email counsel shall confirm with each other of the date and time of this telephonic initial conference. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Sanket J. Bulsara on 7/17/2023. (EM)
|
| Filing 10 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Julian Andres Martinez Alonso. Marie Mahony served on 7/10/2023, answer due 7/31/2023; Daniel Prendergast served on 7/10/2023, answer due 7/31/2023. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit ALI MAHONY, RELATIVE) (Avshalumov, Roman) |
| Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Julian Andres Martinez Alonso. D.P. Paving & Concrete Inc. served on 6/12/2023, answer due 7/3/2023. (Avshalumov, Roman) |
| Filing 8 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (SR) |
| Filing 7 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (SR) |
| Filing 6 Summons Issued as to All Defendants. (SR) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Avraham Y. Scher on behalf of Julian Andres Martinez Alonso (aty to be noticed) (Scher, Avraham) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by James Patrick Peter O'Donnell on behalf of Julian Andres Martinez Alonso (aty to be noticed) (O'Donnell, James) |
| Filing 3 Proposed Summons. Re #1 Complaint, #2 Proposed Summons/Civil Cover Sheet by Julian Andres Martinez Alonso (Avshalumov, Roman) |
| Filing 2 Civil Cover Sheet.. Re #1 Complaint, by Julian Andres Martinez Alonso (Avshalumov, Roman) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against D.P. Paving & Concrete Inc., Marie Mahony, Daniel Prendergast filing fee $ 402, receipt number ANYEDC-16755407 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -NO,, filed by Julian Andres Martinez Alonso. (Avshalumov, Roman) |
| Case Assigned to Judge LaShann DeArcy Hall and Magistrate Judge Sanket J. Bulsara. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (SR) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
