Rowe Plastic Surgery of New Jersey, L.L.C. et al v. BCBS of North Carolina
Plaintiff: Rowe Plastic Surgery of New Jersey, L.L.C. and Norman Maurice Rowe, M.D., M.H.A., L.L.C.
Defendant: BCBS of North Carolina
Case Number: 1:2023cv04549
Filed: June 20, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Presiding Judge: Sanket J Bulsara
Referring Judge: Ann M Donnelly
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 20, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 20, 2023 Case transferred from New York Eastern has been opened in Southern District of New York as case 1:23-cv-06238, filed 07/19/2023. (TLH)
July 17, 2023 Opinion or Order ORDER. The plaintiff states in #8 its letter that venue is properly in the Southern District of New York. The Court construes this letter as a motion to transfer the above-captioned action to the Southern District of New York. The plaintiff's motion is GRANTED and the case is transferred to the Southern District of New York. The Clerk of Court is directed to effectuate this transfer and close this case. Case transferred via ecf. ALL FILINGS ARE TO BE MADE IN THE TRANSFER COURT, DO NOT DOCKET TO THIS CASE. Ordered by Judge Ann M. Donnelly on 7/17/2023. (DG)
July 13, 2023 Filing 9 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Norman Maurice Rowe, M.D., M.H.A., L.L.C., Rowe Plastic Surgery of New Jersey, L.L.C. (Kearns, Brendan)
July 13, 2023 Filing 8 Letter in Response to the Court's Order to Show Cause by Norman Maurice Rowe, M.D., M.H.A., L.L.C., Rowe Plastic Surgery of New Jersey, L.L.C. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Counsel for Plaintiff in Response to Order to Show Cause) (Kearns, Brendan)
July 13, 2023 Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Brendan J Kearns on behalf of All Plaintiffs (aty to be noticed) (Kearns, Brendan)
June 29, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE: For the reasons stated in the attached Order, by 7/13/2023, Plaintiffs shall show cause why this action should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. To the extent that Plaintiffs contend that there is diversity jurisdiction, they must allege the domicile of each of the members of the LLCs. Failure to respond to this order to show cause will result in the action being dismissed. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Sanket J. Bulsara on 6/29/2023. (MD)
June 23, 2023 Filing 5 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (SR)
June 23, 2023 Filing 4 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (SR)
June 23, 2023 Filing 3 Summons Issued as to All Defendants. (SR)
June 23, 2023 Case Assigned to Judge Ann M Donnelly and Magistrate Judge Sanket J. Bulsara. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (SR)
June 22, 2023 Filing 2 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made. (LJ)
June 20, 2023 Filing 1 COMPLAINT Rowe Plastic Surgery of New Jersey, L.L.C., & Norman Maurice Rowe, M.D., M.H.A., L.L.C. against BCBS of North Carolina filing fee $ 402, receipt number ANYEDC-16811417 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -YES,, filed by Rowe Plastic Surgery of New Jersey, L.L.C., Norman Maurice Rowe, M.D., M.H.A., L.L.C.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons, #3 Exhibit) (Baglio, Michael)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Rowe Plastic Surgery of New Jersey, L.L.C. et al v. BCBS of North Carolina
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Rowe Plastic Surgery of New Jersey, L.L.C.
Represented By: Michael Baglio
Represented By: Brendan J Kearns
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Norman Maurice Rowe, M.D., M.H.A., L.L.C.
Represented By: Michael Baglio
Represented By: Brendan J Kearns
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: BCBS of North Carolina
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?