Ma v. Zhou et al
| Yun Zhou, Xiaoqin Sarah Yin and Sarah Yin Medical PLLC |
| Qingyun Ma |
| 1:2023cv04616 |
| June 21, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Lois Bloom |
| LaShann DeArcy Hall |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 23, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
ORDER: The Court shall hold the initial conference in pro se plaintiff's case on September 12, 2023, at 10:30 a.m. in Courtroom 11A South of the United States Courthouse, 225 Cadman Plaza East, Brooklyn, New York. No planning conference pursuant to Rule 26(a) shall be required at this time. Parties are advised that they must contact each other before making any request for an adjournment to the Court. Any request for an adjournment must be received by the Court at least seventy-two (72) hours before the scheduled conference. See attached Order. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Lois Bloom on 8/16/2023. (VP)
|
| Filing 9 ANSWER to #1 Complaint , COUNTERCLAIM against Qingyun Ma by Yun Zhou. (Hirschhorn, Btzalel) |
| Filing 8 Letter Requesting Pre-Motion Conference by Sarah Yin Medical PLLC, Xiaoqin Sarah Yin (Rebhun, Jason) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Jason J Rebhun on behalf of Sarah Yin Medical PLLC, Xiaoqin Sarah Yin (aty to be noticed) (Rebhun, Jason) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER: The Honorable LaShann DeArcy Hall assigned this case to me for all pretrial purposes. Enclosed is a copy of the "Individual Practices of Magistrate Judge Lois Bloom." Plaintiff and defendants, alike, are required to follow these rules. Plaintiff is to provide a copy of this Order and the enclosed rules to defendants along with the summons and complaint.Pro se plaintiff filed the complaint and paid the filing fee in this action on June 21, 2023. ECF Nos. #1 , #2 . Plaintiff shall have 90 days from June 21, 2023 to serve defendants and file proof of proper service of process with the Court. Accordingly, if proper service is not made by September 19, 2023, or if plaintiff fails to show good cause why such service has not been effected by that date, I shall recommend that the Court should dismiss this action without prejudice. See attached Order. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Lois Bloom on 6/27/2023. (VP)
|
| Filing 5 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (KD) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Sarah Yin Medical PLLC, Xiaoqin Sarah Yin, Yun Zhou. (KD) |
| Filing 3 FILING FEE: $ 402.00, receipt number 100007764 (KD) |
| Filing 2 Pro Se Consent to Electronic Notification by Qingyun Ma (KD) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Sarah Yin Medical PLLC, Xiaoqin Sarah Yin, Yun Zhou, filed by Qingyun Ma. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (KD) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
