Velocity Capital Group LLC v. Vyvue, LLC et al
| Velocity Capital Group LLC doing business as Ilend Advance and Vyvue, LLC |
| Bennett E. Hortman, II |
| Velocity Capital Group LLC |
| 1:2023cv04951 |
| June 30, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Orelia E Merchant |
| Cheryl L Pollak |
| Racketeer/Corrupt Organization |
| 18 U.S.C. ยง 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 4, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Bennett E. Hortman, II, Vyvue, LLC re #5 Scheduling Order, (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Mailing Envelope) (Ford, Adam) |
Filing 5
SCHEDULING ORDER: An Initial Conference is set for 9/13/2023 @ 10:15 AM before Magistrate Judge Cheryl L. Pollak. Initial conference will proceed via AT&T conference call. Please dial 877-336-1839 at 10:15 AM. Enter Access code: 380-1746 and security code: 23-4951. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl L. Pollak on 7/26/2023. (DC)
|
| Filing 4 ANSWER to Complaint , COUNTERCLAIM against Velocity Capital Group LLC by Vyvue, LLC, Bennett E. Hortman, II. (Ford, Adam) |
| Case reassigned to Judge Orelia E. Merchant. Judge Eric N. Vitaliano no longer assigned to the case. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (LF) |
| Filing 3 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (SR) |
| Filing 2 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (SR) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Eric N. Vitaliano and Magistrate Judge Cheryl L. Pollak. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (SR) |
| This case has been opened in the Eastern District of New York. If you plan to continue representing your client(s), you must be admitted to practice before this court. You must do so by applying for Pro Hac Vice or permanent admission. To apply for Pro Hac Vice admission, you must first register for an ECF login and password. Please visit the Court's website at www.nyed.uscourts.gov/attorney-admissions for guidance. Once registered, you must electronically file a Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice. You must pay the required pro hac vice fee online. (SR) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Bennett E. Hortman, II from Supreme Court of New York, Kings County, case number 510067/2023. ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ANYEDC-16851107) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet) (Ford, Adam) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
