Liu v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security
Lihui Liu |
U.S. Department of Homeland Security |
1:2023cv05512 |
July 20, 2023 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
Dora Lizette Irizarry |
Other Immigration Actions |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 31, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
ORDER DISMISSING CASE per #7 . So Ordered by Judge Dora Lizette Irizarry on 8/31/2023. (CC) |
Filing 7 STIPULATION of Dismissal without prejudice by U.S. Department of Homeland Security (Territola, Toniann) |
Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Lihui Liu. U.S. Department of Homeland Security served on 7/25/2023, answer due 9/25/2023. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Proof of mailing) (Han, Li) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Toniann Territola on behalf of U.S. Department of Homeland Security (aty to be noticed) (Territola, Toniann) |
Filing 4 Summons Issued as to U.S. Department of Homeland Security, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (KD) |
Filing 3 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (KD) |
Filing 2 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (KD) |
Case Assigned to Judge Dora Lizette Irizarry. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (KD) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against U.S. Department of Homeland Security filing fee $ 402, receipt number ANYEDC-16911609 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -YES,, filed by Lihui Liu. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Plaintiff's Employment Authorization Document, #2 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Proposed Summons Proposed Summons) (Han, Li) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Liu v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Lihui Liu | |
Represented By: | Li Han |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: U.S. Department of Homeland Security | |
Represented By: | Toniann Territola |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.